Measuring Social Value Orientation

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

Narrow self-interest is often used as a simplifying assumption when studying people making decisions in social contexts. Nonetheless, people exhibit a wide range of different motivations when choosing unilaterally among interdependent outcomes. Measuring the magnitude of the concern people have for others, sometimes called Social Value Orientation (SVO), has been an interest of many social scientists for decades and several different measurement methods have been developed so far. Here we introduce a new measure of SVO that has several advantages over existent methods. A detailed description of the new measurement method is presented, along with norming data that provide evidence of its solid psychometric properties. We conclude with a brief discussion of the research streams that would benefit from a more sensitive and higher resolution measure of SVO, and extend an invitation to others to use this new measure which is freely available.

Authors and Affiliations

Ryan O. Murphy, Kurt A. Ackerman and Michel J. J. Handgraaf

Keywords

Related Articles

True-and-error models violate independence and yet they are testable

Birnbaum (2011) criticized tests of transitivity that are based entirely on binary choice proportions. When assumptions of independence and stationarity (iid) of choice responses are violated, choice proportions could le...

Belief bias and representation in assessing the Bayesian rationality of others

People often assess the reasonableness of another person’s judgments. When doing so, the evaluator should set aside knowledge that would not have been available to the evaluatee to assess whether the evaluatee made a rea...

Is that the answer you had in mind? The effect of perspective on unethical behavior

We explored how the perspective through which individuals view their actions influences their ethicality, comparing a narrow perspective that allows for evaluation of each choice in isolation, to a broad perspective that...

Short-sighted greed? Focusing on the future promotes reputation-based generosity

Long-term thinking and voluntary resource sharing are two distinctive traits of human nature. Across three experiments (N=1,082), I propose a causal connection: Sometimes people are generous because they think about the...

Choice-induced preference change and the free-choice paradigm: A clarification

Positive spreading of ratings or rankings in the classical free-choice paradigm is commonly taken to indicate choice-induced change in preferences and has motivated influential theories as cognitive dissonance theory and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677861
  • DOI -
  • Views 193
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ryan O. Murphy, Kurt A. Ackerman and Michel J. J. Handgraaf (2011). Measuring Social Value Orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677861