Mental Existence Debates in the Post-Classical Period: A Study in the Context of the Essence and Category of Knowledge
Journal Title: Nazariyat İslam Felsefe ve Bilim Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 3
Abstract
The debates on the idea of mental existence is one of the issues in which the tension between the basic principles of Avicennian ontology and his epistemology is most evident. The question of mental existence, which developed into a problématique as a result of Fakhr al- Dīn al-Rāzī’s efforts to trace Avicennian philosophy’s intimations, possessed a character that expanded through different prospects and perspectives following both the arguments advanced in support of this idea and the major challenges that the Avicennian theory of perception and knowledge met. It thus became a target for criticism in due course. This study takes as its subject matter the most significant criticism against the idea of mental existence and the perspectives that attempt to settle the ensuing problem in this context. This particular criticism and the pursuit of a solution is a notable part of the mental existence debates that were current from the thirteenth to the nineteenth centuries. The criticism mainly concerns the tension between the mental form as knowledge and its equivalence with the external object in terms of essence. Accordingly, mental form is a knowledge and an accident in the category of quality. If the object of perception is a substance and the mental image is its equivalent in essence, then the mental image also has to be a substance, which requires the form to be both a substance and an accident. This article, which pursues the trail of the mental existence debate by means of this criticism, tackles the following matters: (i) the media and channels that conveyed the mental existence debate that took shape after al-Rāzī'’s interventions, (ii) the nature of the relation between knowledge and mental existence, and (iii) those suggestions that address the criticism and solutions concerning the category of knowledge.
Authors and Affiliations
Murat Kaş
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP450180
- DOI 10.12658/Nazariyat.4.3.M0061en
- Views 169
- Downloads 0
Two Competing Approaches in the Mu‘tazilite View of the Human Being: The Traditions of Abū al-Hudhayl and al-Naẓẓām
The aim of this article is to illustrate the two human conceptions introduced in the Basran School of Muʿtazila with their reflections on the fields like theoretical physics, epistemology, and ethics. In the Muʿtazilite...
Quests for a General Method to Solve the Equations of High Degree in the History of Islamic Mathematics: The Case of Irshad al-tullab ila ‘ilm al-hisab
This article introduces a book titled Irshād al-tullāb ilā ‘ilm al-hisāb, written by an anonymous author who most probably lived in Ottoman lands, presented the book to Ottoman Sultan Bayezid II. In the epilogue of the b...
An Analysis of the Section on Causality in Khojazada’s Tahafut
In this article, the nineteenth section of Khojazāda’s (d. 893/1488) Tahāfut, which was devoted to the problem of causality in an example of the works under the same title written during the fifteenth century and compose...
The Problem of Periodization in Sufi Studies: The Struggle of Sufism to Become a Discipline Between the Religious Sciences and Metaphysics
The periodization of sciences is one of the essential devices of treating a field by specification and tracing the transformations in that field. Nonetheless, it would be hard to speak of robust periodization concerning...
The Debate on the Nature of the Science of Tafsir in the Tradition of Sharhs and Hashiyas on al-Kashshaf
The sharhs and hashiyahs written on al-Zamakhshari’s (d. 538/1144) al-Kashshāf formed an effective writing tradition and are connected to each other in terms of influence, quotation, rejection, objection, and answering....