Metapragmatic analysis of academic discourse

Abstract

The article focuses on the study of the academic discourse notion and results of its metapragmatic analysis. Having singled out three stages of metapragmatic analysis of any discourse type, only two of them are discussed. The first step is connected with the elaboration of a unified classification of various meta‐units in general, which the author differentiates into autonomous group of meta‐units, including contact markers, interaction‐regulating markers, reflexive markers (which are not in the focus of this research) and discourse‐organizers; and contextually‐dependant one. Then, the metapragmatic functions they perform in academic discourse are studied, with an emphasis on the specifics of their use in this discourse type. In relation to specifics of academic metadiscourse, the research results show that most typical for this discourse type are affective, evaluating, generalizing, summarizing, comparative, conditional markers, statives and verificators. Special attention is drawn to, first, accentuators, intention‐markers and guarantors, which attract addressees’ attention to speaker’s ideas, assumptions, intentions, plans, beliefs etc.; second, discourse organizers, i.e., frequency, coherent, cohesive and conclusive markers, responsible for easy flow of thoughts and speech. On the contrary, reference markers are, actually, not so characteristic of academic discourse as it was hypothesized. Despite the demands of scientific style, the latter are restricted to short references and rather vague and rare examples; citations are avoided. The use of contextually‐dependent meta‐ units is also not distinctive of academic discourse; moreover, they are realized only via modal expressions which can be viewed as being metapragmatic.

Authors and Affiliations

Я. В. Гнезділова

Keywords

Related Articles

Medical narrative as a linguistic category.

The paper substantiates theoretical and methodological principles for comprehensive study of the English medical narrative, taking into account the achievements of modern narratological, cognitive and communicative resea...

Metaphorical actualization of negative emotions in fiction discourse

The article deals with the analysis of negative emotions metaphorisation peculiarities in literary discourse. The semantic and onomasiological essence of this extralingual phenomenon has been cleared out. It also focuses...

The rhetoric model of law communication

The paper is focused on the rhetoric features of law communication. The law discourse is built on certain rhetoric model, which contributes to creating the relevant understanding level between communicators (discourse pa...

The principle of lucid poetics: the ambivalent play or the play of ambivalence

The article focuses on the problem of ambivalence in English postmodern literary text, the key feature of which is the lucidity. It is proved, that ambivalence of different kinds (affective, cognitive, voluntative) reinf...

Relative semantic community of interlexemes in English, French and Ukrainian languages.

This article is dedicated to the analysis of the interlexemes with relative complete and incomplete semantic community in English, French and Ukrainian languages. Globalization influences on the linguistic science, which...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP497651
  • DOI -
  • Views 113
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Я. В. Гнезділова (2018). Metapragmatic analysis of academic discourse. Львівський філологічний часопис, 3(), 64-67. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-497651