Metapragmatic analysis of academic discourse

Abstract

The article focuses on the study of the academic discourse notion and results of its metapragmatic analysis. Having singled out three stages of metapragmatic analysis of any discourse type, only two of them are discussed. The first step is connected with the elaboration of a unified classification of various meta‐units in general, which the author differentiates into autonomous group of meta‐units, including contact markers, interaction‐regulating markers, reflexive markers (which are not in the focus of this research) and discourse‐organizers; and contextually‐dependant one. Then, the metapragmatic functions they perform in academic discourse are studied, with an emphasis on the specifics of their use in this discourse type. In relation to specifics of academic metadiscourse, the research results show that most typical for this discourse type are affective, evaluating, generalizing, summarizing, comparative, conditional markers, statives and verificators. Special attention is drawn to, first, accentuators, intention‐markers and guarantors, which attract addressees’ attention to speaker’s ideas, assumptions, intentions, plans, beliefs etc.; second, discourse organizers, i.e., frequency, coherent, cohesive and conclusive markers, responsible for easy flow of thoughts and speech. On the contrary, reference markers are, actually, not so characteristic of academic discourse as it was hypothesized. Despite the demands of scientific style, the latter are restricted to short references and rather vague and rare examples; citations are avoided. The use of contextually‐dependent meta‐ units is also not distinctive of academic discourse; moreover, they are realized only via modal expressions which can be viewed as being metapragmatic.

Authors and Affiliations

Я. В. Гнезділова

Keywords

Related Articles

The functions of parenthesis in TV recaps (based on online-media).

The article deals with the syntactic features of TV recaps. The analysis of parenthesis shows that it is one of the most frequently used means of expressive syntax in TV recaps. The main structural types of parenthesis w...

Fascinative Space of English Advertising Communication

The article investigates the notion “fascination” in the context of English advertising communication. Special attention is drawn to the discoursive characteristic features of fascination, its pragmatic potential. Discou...

Plot Forming Function of Ekphrasis in Ali Smith's Novels.

The article focuses on the peculiarities of ekphrasis functioning in a postmodern text characterized by intermediality which is based on the interaction of multiple arts codes. It gives a short overview of researches bei...

Metaphors and phraseological elements of material culture as a manifestation of householdcentrism (on the basis of Polish and other Slavonic languages)

The proposed exploration deals with the praseological units, related to weaving. Semantic, linguistic and cultural analysis on the subject code and life-mode centrism reflection principle in imagery nominations of Polish...

Сoncept of FIRE in the poetry by I. V. Zhilenko.

The article is devoted to the linguistic realization of the concept of FIRE in the poetic idiostyle of the famous Ukrainian writer I. V. Zhilenko. Attention is paid to semantic spheres and semantic content, which form th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP497651
  • DOI -
  • Views 112
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Я. В. Гнезділова (2018). Metapragmatic analysis of academic discourse. Львівський філологічний часопис, 3(), 64-67. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-497651