NOMA as the Cure for Conflict Between Science and Religion: Reply to Ludwik Kowalski’s Commentary on the NOMA Principle

Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2014, Vol 11, Issue

Abstract

In my response to Kowalski’s commentary I indicate that: 1) there is an imprecision in Kowalski’s presentation of the NOMA principle; 2) the NOMA principle is not a valid way of presenting theistic religions; 3) the argumentation adopted by Kowalski is inconsistent, due to inconsistency in the NOMA principle itself. The Kowalski’s cure for the “Confrontations Between Theists and Atheists” mentioned in the title of the Kowalski’s commentary is the postulate of a “miracle-free” theism, which means the elimination of theism. Another important weakness of Kowalski’s proposal and of the application of the NOMA principle in general is the self-contradictoriness of this position: when we decide on the truth value of this or that factual religious statement by reference to science, then we deny the essence of the NOMA principle itself.

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Bylica

Keywords

Related Articles

Finding Design in Nature

The aim of this paper is to dispel doubts that has grown around the pope John Paul II’s statement in which he allegedly proclaimed his view that the Catholic Church has accepted Darwinian theory of evolution. Cardinal Sc...

„Tańczący z Popperem”. Dembski o sprawdzalności

W odniesieniu do sporu o naukowość darwinowskiej teorii ewolucji oraz teorii inteligentnego projektu autor dokonuje przeglądu kluczowych pojęć filozofii Karla Poppera, jak falsyfikowalność, sprawdzalność czy obalalność t...

Cybernetics and Literature

Review of: Benjamin Bühler, Lebende Körper. Biologisches und anthropologisches Wissen bei Rilke, Döblin und Jünger, Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg 2005, pp. 325.

O programie badawczym teorii inteligentnego projektu

Zgodnie z teorią inteligentnego projektu pewne zjawiska biologiczne i kosmiczne zostały zaprojektowane przez istotę inteligentną, która równie dobrze może być naturalna, jak nadnaturalna, a projekt ten jest wykrywalny na...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP76286
  • DOI -
  • Views 178
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Piotr Bylica (2014). NOMA as the Cure for Conflict Between Science and Religion: Reply to Ludwik Kowalski’s Commentary on the NOMA Principle. Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, 11(), 29-34. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-76286