Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zabrania głosu w debacie nad wnioskiem o odwołanie Marszałka Sejmu przez Marszałka Sejmu lub posła rekomendowanego na to stanowisko

Journal Title: Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych - Year 2015, Vol 45, Issue 1

Abstract

Legal opinion on the possibility of speaking in the debate on the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm by the Marshal of the Sejm or a Deputy recommended for this position: The author analyzes the normative model derived from the Standing Orders of the Sejm and confronts the theoretical assumptions with parliamentary practice accompanying the procedure for election of the Marshal of the Sejm, based on its similarity to the procedure for recall of the Marshal of the Sejm. He argues that the general principles set out in Chapter 2, “Debates of the Sejm” in Section III of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, should apply to this matter in question. The said provisions do not provide for specific powers that would give the Deputies subject to the motion for the recall of the Marshal of the Sejm the right to speak in the debate in accordance with the rules different from those defining the procedure for taking floor by other speakers. It should be assumed that in the debate on a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm the questions in the debate can be responded by their intended addressees, i.e. a person subject to the motion or the designated candidate. There is no specific basis in the Standing Orders that would allow giving a speech by the Deputy subject to the motion when no question has been addressed to him/her during the debate.

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Odrowąż-Sypniewski

Keywords

Related Articles

Utrzymanie porządku na chodnikach przylegających do posesji

According to the Act on Maintaining Cleanliness and Order in Communes, real estate owners are obliged to maintain cleanliness and order by, inter alia, cleaning up mud, snow, ice and other pollutants from sidewalks adjac...

Opinia prawna na temat niektórych skutków projektowanej nowelizacji przepisów art. 156 i 158 Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego

In the author’s opinion the amendment would result, inter alia, in adapting the provisions of the Code of Administrative Procedure relating to the declaration of invalidity of administrative decisions to the principles e...

Ocena projektu ustawy o ochronie danych osobowych (druk sejmowy nr 2410)

Due to the fact that EU regulations are directly applicable in the Member States’ legal systems, a number of obligations concerning personal data protection is based directly on the GDPR. Thus the governmental bill regul...

Opinia prawna na temat rządowego projektu ustawy o Narodowej Agencji Wymiany Akademickiej z projektami aktów wykonawczych

The subject of the opinion is assessment of the governmental bill, pursuant to which the National Agency of Academic Exchange will be created. Its aims include stimulating Poland’s development in the field of science and...

Opinia prawna w sprawie statusu posła zatrudnionego na stanowisku sekretarza gminy

A person employed as secretary of the commune (county, province), who has been granted unpaid leave in connection with the assumption of a seat in parliament, is still subject to the statutory prohibition on the creation...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP199078
  • DOI -
  • Views 73
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wojciech Odrowąż-Sypniewski (2015). Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zabrania głosu w debacie nad wnioskiem o odwołanie Marszałka Sejmu przez Marszałka Sejmu lub posła rekomendowanego na to stanowisko. Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych, 45(1), 75-82. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-199078