PLANNED DIFFERENCES: ARGENTINA’S UNIVERSAL CHILD ALLOWANCE FROM A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE

Journal Title: Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 11

Abstract

This article intends to analyze Universal Child Allowance (UCA)—a large-scale conditional cash transfer (CCT) program in Argentina—from a human rights and constitutional perspective. Conditions required in the UCA system—which covers informal and unemployed workers—are compared to those established in family allowances, the contributory program created for registered workers. These differences in treatment are analyzed in connection with the right to equal treatment, taking into account applicable legal materials, including caselaw and theoretical contributions. After describing CCT programs in general and the specific features of UCA, and outlining Argentina’s constitutional and human rights framework, the article describes the specific conditions—maximum income, nationality, maximum number of covered children—applied only to informal and unregistered workers included in the UCA program. Compared to family allowances beneficiaries, workers under UCA have a much lower maximum wage limit to be eligible, and their children must fulfill nationality or legal residence requirements not applicable under the family allowances system. UCA covers only up to five children per family, while family allowances are paid to every child in formal workers’ families, with no restrictions. The article concludes that these planned differences in treatment are not admissible under Argentina’s human rights obligations and constitutional setting. The article also advocates a human rights-based design for social policies, in order to ensure consistency with Argentina’s Constitution and international obligations.

Authors and Affiliations

Horacio Javier Etchichury

Keywords

Related Articles

Law... For what?

This paper provides an overview of the work “El Derecho... ¿para qué?” of Jaime Baquero de la Calle. The overview analyzes the sources, the type of documents and examples that are used in it. Includes an explanation of t...

MEDIATION AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN MEXICO

This paper describes the origin and development of the mediation in Mexico, a procedure that is currently gaining great force in that country. However, its beginning dating from 1997 had a certain problematic since the m...

REGULATIONS OF DETERMINING LAW GOVERNING TO ARBITRABILITY

Determining the law applicable to arbitrability is of paramount importance because the procedures taken by the legal system are very different. In this way, some systems principally recognize any disputes eligible for re...

Paradigms For Legal Drafting As A Means Of Achieving Legal Certainty: A Safe Bet?

Different works concerned with the drafting of legislation consider that its language should be simple, clear and precise if it is to offer legal certainty. However legal certainty is understood, at first sight this p...

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND FUNDAMENTAL SOCIAL RIGHTS

The aim of this work is to show that the administrative law of a social and democratic state based on the rule of law is the right that the government has to liberty in solidarity. The method used is specific of legal re...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP36112
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v7i0.200
  • Views 409
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Horacio Javier Etchichury (2018). PLANNED DIFFERENCES: ARGENTINA’S UNIVERSAL CHILD ALLOWANCE FROM A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE. Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho, 7(11), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-36112