Prognostic Value of Preoperative Neutrophil-lymphocyte/ Platelet-lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Stage II-III Rectal Cancer Who Underwent Curative Resection
Journal Title: Istanbul Medical Journal - Year 2020, Vol 21, Issue 5
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value and survival effects of the neutrophil-lymphocyte/ platelet-lymphocyte ratio (NLR/PLR) in the preoperative peripheral blood count of patients who underwent curative resection due to stage II-III rectal cancer. Methods: Between 2011 and 2017, a total of 156 patients with stage II-III rectal cancer who underwent curative resection were evaluated. Before the curative resection, complete blood counts were obtained within 3 days. The last follow-up was in December 2018. NLR and PLR were calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil or platelet count by the absolute lymphocyte count, respectively. Results: Postoperatively, adenocarcinoma histology (p=0.025), R1 resection (p<0.001), T4 stage (p=0.001), N stage positivity (p=0.003), tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage III disease (p=0.002), presence of lenfovascular invasion (p<0.001), presence of perineural invasion (p<0.001), preoperative NLR ≥3.6 (p<0.001) and PLR ≥192 (p<0.001) were identified in the rectal cancer patients as factors that influence survival in univariate analysis. In our study, R1 resection [hazard ratio (HR): 0.341; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.157-0.740; p=0.007]; T4 stage (HR: 0.261; 95% CI: 0.129-0.527; p<0.001), N0 stage vs N1 positivity (HR: 0.071; 95% CI: 0.010-0.525; p=0.010), N0 stage vs N2 positivity (HR: 0.068; 95% CI: 0.008- 0.565; p=0.013), presence of metastases (HR: 0.130; 95% CI: 0.054-0.309, p<0.001), TNM stage III (HR: 0.261; 95% CI: 0.129- 0.527, p<0.001) and preoperative NLR ≥3.6 (HR: 0.378; 95% CI: 0.154-0.930, p=0.034) were identified as independent factors affecting survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: In our study, due to the low cost, it extensive use, and association with overall survival, NLR was found to be a better prognostic marker. Besides, R1 resection, T4 stage, lymph node positivity, presence of metastases, TNM stage III were found to be prognostic factors that negatively affect overall survival. NLR is a biomarker that is thought to be an indicator of the systemic inflammatory response and can be easily obtained as a prognostic biomarker candidate.
Authors and Affiliations
Özlem Mermut, Berrin İnanç, Nevra Dursun, Didem Can Trabulus, Aytül Hande Yardımcı, Esra Arslan
Predictors of Complex Aortic Plaques in Patients Undergoing Transoesophageal Echocardiography
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most important causes of ischaemic stroke according to the TOAST classification. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is a widely used scoring system for estimating systemic thrombo...
Contribution of the Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Classification of Hepatic Hydatid Cyst Types
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to provide a classification of different types of hepatic hydatid cysts by measuring the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and exponential apparent diffusion coefficient...
Prediction of Prognostic Factors in the Survival of Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients with Multiple Brain Metastases
Introduction: We aimed to investigate the factors affecting survival in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with multiple brain metastases. Methods: One hundred thirty patients who were diagnosed with NSCLC at t...
Cardiac Hydatid Disease and Extracardiac Organ Involvement: A Tertiary Single-Center Experience
Introduction: Cardiac involvement is rare in hydatid cyst disease, which accounted for 0.5%-2% of all hydatidosis cases. Cardiac cysts usually occur as part of a wider infestation with extracardiac involvement. This stud...
Endoscopic Approach to Esophageal Leiomyomas: Single Center Results
Introduction: Leiomyoma is the most common esophageal benign lesion. There are many treatment methods from endoscopic treatment methods to surgery in the treatment of leiomyoma. In this study, we evaluated the results of...