PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES of SOCIO-POLITICAL CONFLICTS IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIAL RELATIONS

Abstract

Any of society as heterogeneous great number conflict after the nature, than more difficult social structure of society, than anymore in him freedom and pluralism, moreover differentiated statuses, roles, functions, and sometimes and mutually exclusive interests, values, and, thus, more potential sources and reasons for conflicts. Therefore of conflicts are similarly natural for any level of collective vital functions, as well as all other forms of her display. In any conflict a psychological constituent conducts, thus conflicts between individuals are mostly based on emotions and personal hostility, and intergroup conflicts are usually carried by faceless character, the flashes of the personal hostility are although possible. An arising up conflict process it is difficult to stop. It is explained by that he always has cumulative nature, id est, every aggressive action results in an action in reply, thus stronger, than primary. A socio-political conflict destroys social associations in the first turn, negatively influences on group unity and on subjects psychologically apt to дезадаптації, that is why this problem is not only sociological, political, but also mostly psychological both from the point of view of influence of socio-political conflict on personality and from position of necessity of adjustment measures in relation to his consequences. The of psychological constituent of socio — political conflict is densely related both to his structure and with those individual properties that activate during his origin and development — with an emotional sphere, aggressiveness, suggestibility, by an anxiety and others like that. Complication of of socio — political conflicts consists in the ambiguousness of their consequences, namely: integration of consequences strengthen bitterness, result in destruction and bloodshed, to the increase of internal tension, divert attention members of group from vital problems; and integration consequences determine an exit from difficult situations, result in the decision of problems, strengthen group solidarity, push slightly a group to understanding of interests and necessities of her members.

Authors and Affiliations

A. Sh. Koval

Keywords

Related Articles

THE ROLE OF EMOTIONAL INTELLECT IN THE FORMATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION OF MODERN YOUTH

The article deals with the emotional system of a human as one of main regulatory systems of vital functions, emotional orientation the sense of which is in the ability of recognizing emotional states of other people and...

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF PERSISTENT AS PROPERTIES OF PERSONALITY

In the psychological context of persistent provides achieving of personality, serves as the internal condition of organization of vital functions of man, regulator of major moral values. An of psychological structure of...

PECULIARITIES OF GENDER RELATED APPROACHES OF PEOPLE WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING

The article describes the main considerations of the problem of psychological wellbeing of an individual: the hedonistic and eudemonistic. On the grounds of theoretical analysis and influenced by rapidly developing human...

SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE OF INTERNET ADDICTED ADOLESCENTS

The article presents the study of the psychological factors of adolescents’ Internet addiction appearing as a complex of personal neoformations under the influence of family ill-being and in the context of age-dependent...

NEUROLINGUISTIC FEATURES OF SPEECH APHASIAS

Formulation of scientific problem and its significance. Questions dealing with speech pathology, speech disorders and speech normally have been inextricably linked to biological data on the organization of language in th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP362759
  • DOI -
  • Views 103
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. Sh. Koval (2016). PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES of SOCIO-POLITICAL CONFLICTS IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIAL RELATIONS. Вісник Одеського національного університету. Психологія, 21(2), 114-120. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-362759