Quality-by-Design: Are We There Yet?

Journal Title: AAPS PharmSciTech - Year 2014, Vol 15, Issue 1

Abstract

In 2012, the Quality-by-Design and Product Performance Focus Group of AAPS conducted a survey to assess the state of adoption and perception of Quality-by-Design (QbD). Responses from 149 anonymous individuals from industry—including consultants—(88%), academia (7%), and regulatory body (4%), were collected. A majority of respondents (54% to 76%) reported high frequency of utilization of several tools and most QbD elements outlined by International Conference on Harmonization Q8, with design of experiments, risk assessment, and the quality target product profile ranked as the top three. Over two thirds of respondents agreed that the benefits of QbD included both the positive impact it can have on the patient (78%), as well as on internal processes such as knowledge management (85%), decision making (79%), and lean manufacture (71%). However, more than 50% from industry were neutral about or disagreed with QbD leading to a better return on investment. This suggests that, despite the recognized scientific, manufacture, and patient-related benefits, there is not yet a clearly articulated business case for QbD available. There was a difference of opinion between industry and regulatory agency respondents as to whether a QbD-based submission resulted in increased efficiency of review. These contrasting views reinforce the idea that QbD implementation can benefit from further dialog between industry and regulatory authorities. A majority of respondents from academia indicated that QbD has influenced their research. In total, the results indicate the broad adoption of QbD but also suggest we are yet in a journey and that the process of gathering all experience and metrics required for connecting and demonstrating QbD benefits to all stakeholders is still in progress.

Authors and Affiliations

Jack Cook, Maria T. Cruañes, Manish Gupta, Steve Riley, John Crison

Keywords

Related Articles

The Effect of Streptozotocin and Alloxan on the mRNA Expression of Rat Hepatic Transporters In Vivo

The effect of streptozotocin (STZ) and alloxan (ALX) on the hepatic messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of four transporters (Mrp2, Mdr1, Oct1, and Oatp1) was studied in the present work. After the healthy male Wistar rats w...

Thermal Processing of PVP- and HPMC-Based Amorphous Solid Dispersions

Thermal processing technologies continue to gain interest in pharmaceutical manufacturing. However, the types and grades of polymers that can be utilized in common thermal processing technologies, such as hot-melt extrus...

Conjugation of Hot-Melt Extrusion with High-Pressure Homogenization: a Novel Method of Continuously Preparing Nanocrystal Solid Dispersions

Over the past few decades, nanocrystal formulations have evolved as promising drug delivery systems owing to their ability to enhance the bioavailability and maintain the stability of poorly water-soluble drugs. However,...

Ilex paraguariensis Pellets from a Spray-Dried Extract: Development, Characterization, and Stability

Several studies have shown the potential use of Ilex paraguariensis in developing products with the aim to protect biological systems against oxidative stress-mediated damages. In the same way, technological studies have...

Nanomicellar Topical Aqueous Drop Formulation of Rapamycin for Back-of-the-Eye Delivery

The objective of this study was to develop a clear, aqueous rapamycin-loaded mixed nanomicellar formulations (MNFs) for the back-of-the-eye delivery. MNF of rapamycin (0.2%) was prepared with vitamin E tocopherol polyeth...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP682344
  • DOI  10.1208/s12249-013-0043-1
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jack Cook, Maria T. Cruañes, Manish Gupta, Steve Riley, John Crison (2014). Quality-by-Design: Are We There Yet?. AAPS PharmSciTech, 15(1), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-682344