Quantification of Harm and the Damages Directive: Implementation in CEE Countries
Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2017, Vol 10, Issue 15
Abstract
Quantification of harm is regarded as one of the most significant obstacles for the full compensation of harm and development of private enforcement within the European Union, including CEE Member States. Consequently, the Damages Directive establishes general rules and requirements for the quantification of harm, such as a rebuttable presumption of harm in case of cartels, the power of national courts to estimate harm as well as others, which closely interact with the principle of full compensation emphasized by the case-law of the European Union and directly established in the Damages Directive. The main focus of this paper is the effectiveness of the rules on the quantification of harm in general, and how these rules will contribute to the development of private antitrust enforcement in CEE Member States. Therefore, one of the issues to be discussed in the paper is the analysis of how, and to what extent specific rules and requirements for the quantification of harm have been transposed into the national legislation of CEE Member States. As certain CEE national jurisdictions have had certain rules for the quantification of harm already before the implementation of the Damages Directive, the paper analyses how effective these rules have been, and how much they have contributed to the development of private antitrust enforcement of those CEE national jurisdictions. Previous experience of those CEE Member States in applying specific rules for the quantification of harm is important, in order to assess the possible impact of the newly introduced rules on the quantification of harm and on private antitrust enforcement in general in other CEE Member States. The rules for the quantification of harm will not enhance private antitrust enforcement on their own, however, their effective application by national courts together with other rules under the Damages Directive should contribute to a quicker development of private enforcement in CEE Members States.
Authors and Affiliations
Valentinas Navickas, Rasa Zaščiurinskaitė
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP319183
- DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.15.6
- Views 38
- Downloads 0
Marketplaces Restrictions and Selective Distribution after Coty Germany
This article discusses the framework of selective distribution agreements within EU competition law following the Coty Germany case and the EU Commission’s 2017 E-commerce report. It argues that the judgment removed, i...
Consensual Dispute Resolution in the Damage Directive. Implementation in CEE Countries
This paper discusses the use of consensual dispute resolution for the purpose of antitrust damage claims as introduced by the Directive. It presents these type of claims in a broader context of arbitration (or ADR), in c...
Security and regulation of the energy market: national academic conference on the 5th anniversary of the Society of Energy Law and Other Infrastructural Sectors of the University of Łódź, 24 May 2017 (conference report)
On 24 May 2017, the First National Academic Conference “Security and regulation of the energy market” was held at the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Łódź (WPiA UŁ). The Society of Energy Law and O...
The European Competition Network in the European Administrative System: Theoretical Concerns
The public administration of the European Union (EU) is a sui generis multi-level structure under constant development. After five decades of successful functioning, the European Union still lacks a coherent and comprehe...
A Comparative Analysis of the Collective Dominance Definition in Ukrainian and European Law – the Electricity Market Case
This paper follows acomparative approach to the analysis of collective dominance doctrine and practice in the EU and the enforcement practice in Ukraine. The aim of this paper is to assess the compliance of the Ukrainian...