ROLE OF THE INSOLVENCY ADMINISTRATOR AND OF THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER IN THE DYNAMICS OF THE CONTRACTS OF DEBTOR IN INSOLVENCY, IN THE REGULATION OF THE INSOLVENCY CODE
Journal Title: Challenges of the Knowledge Society - Year 2016, Vol 6, Issue 0
Abstract
On 25 June 2014, the Law no.85/2014 was published in the Official Gazette, that sets forth the rules in the field of preventing insolvency and in the insolvency field itself. A special attention needs to be paid on to the insolvency administrator and the official receiver, deemed by the doctrine in the former doctrine and in the former regulation, as participants in the insolvency procedure participants in the insolvency procedure. This study does not aim to make an exhaustive inventory of the tasks of the duties of the two participants in the insolvency procedure. This study starts from the premises that the insolvency procedure targets the covering of the debtor liabilities, by granting, where possible, the chance of redressing its activity. It starts from an evident ascertainment: namely that, on the date of initiating the insolvency procedure, the debtor’s activity is not interrupted ex abrupto and finally, that it may continue during the observation time, during the reorganization period and even after falling bankrupt. Or, an ongoing activity implies the development of some previously concluded contracts, their denunciation and even the conclusion of some new contracts. Therefore, during the procedure, such dynamics of the debtor contracts is vitally important. In the doctrine focused on the former regulation, the two participants in the procedure were deemed as “justice attorneys”, and in this recent doctrine they were appreciated as “justice representatives”. This study proposes also another approach of the quality of representative of both participants in the procedure, an approach that would emphasize the legal relationships between the insolvency administrator and the official receiver, on one hand and the debtor in insolvency, on the other hand. On other words, the study wants to emphasize where the insolvency administrator and official receiver, depending on the incumbent legal tasks, in relationship with the debtor.
Authors and Affiliations
Eugenia VOICHECI
THE EXECUTION INSTANCE OF THE JUDICIAL JUDGEMENTS SENTENCED IN THE LITIGATIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENTIOUS
The instance which solved the fund of the litigation rising from an administrative contract differs depending on the material competence sanctioned by law, in contrast to the subject of the commercial law where the execu...
THE LEGAL REGIME OF THE UNILATERAL PROMISE REGARDING THE SALE CONTRACT
The conclusion of a sale contract is often preceded by several agreements or temporary contracts taking several forms in the Romanian contemporary law, such as: the preference pact, the option pact, the unilateral and bi...
ROMANIA’S SECURITY POLICY CONCERNING THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION AND ORGANIZED CRIME
The corruption is an ubiquitous phenomenon that can be met in different countries from an ideological, economical or state development point of view. Taking in consideration the way how this phenomenon affects the econom...
ENERGY RELATIONS BETWEEN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AFTER THE EUROMAIDAN: TRAPPED BETWEEN THE CONTRACTUAL SPACE AND THE SPACE OF SPACES
Russia-Ukraine energy relations have been mired in constant tension and contract renegotiations since the fall of the Soviet Union. Major examples of the conflict ridden character of mutual energy relations are the big d...
“IS THE LABOUR RELATION OF THE CIVIL SERVANT AN ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACT?”
Nowadays, public institutions have contractual employees, hired on the basis of the Labour Code, and public servants, appointed on the basis of the Civil Service Statute. If the labour relation of the public servant is n...