Rozstrzyganie polubowne sporów związanych z rejestracją domen internetowych – cz. I
Journal Title: ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 36
Abstract
Arbitration is certainly not free from defects, which shows the practice of law, often inconsistent and it poses many problems. It was recognized, however, that this formula still works better than the use of courts of general jurisdiction. Another thing is that the powers of arbitration panels are limited and actually come down to determine the rights or lack of rights to the domain, which is not always sufficient from the point of view of the entities involved in the proceedings. As I have shown in this study, arbitration works on several levels. First of all, it is important that matters concerning .pl domains fall under the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration for Internet Domains with the Polish Chamber of Information Technology and Telecommunications, the .eu – European body, i.e. the Arbitration Center for .EU Disputes. Moreover, in many cases it is necessary to ask the subordinate body of the World Intellectual Property Organization, which decides each year a number of issues relating to domain.com. In addition, the parties may individually and according to their needs define the rules by which their dispute will be recognized – all principles must be included in the contract. However, most agreements are laconic records and any disputes arising from the contract are subject to arbitration. With this general record, the parties must realize that their freedom is limited and the arbitration proceedings will take place on the basis of provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure. In summary, the institution amicable settlement is certainly useful and functional, but brings a lot of practical problems which are not easy to solve. The multitude of cases regarding domains indicates, however, the need for the existence of such bodies and the continuous improvement of legal solutions in this topic. Because the statistics speak for themselves, from year to year, there is a growing number of "domain” disputes, which are demanding the right of greater precision in the functioning of the bodies responsible for the settlement of these disputes
Authors and Affiliations
Marta Kamińska
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP181935
- DOI -
- Views 59
- Downloads 0
Sprawozdanie z międzynarodowej konferencji z cyklu: Arbitraż i mediacja w teorii i praktyce pt. „Arbitraż i mediacja – instytucje powszechne czy elitarne” (Nowy Tomyśl, 22.4.2016 r.)
W dniu 22.4.2016 r. odbyła się międzynarodowa konferencja z cyklu: Arbitraż i mediacja w teorii i praktyce pt.: „Arbitraż i mediacja – instytucje powszechne czy elitarne”. Konferencje z tego cyklu cieszą się dużym zainte...
25 Jahre Mediation im Nachbarland Polen
Poland’s and Germany’s immediate vicinity, the intensive economic exchange between the two countries and last but not least, the fact that Poland is going through such an impressive development suggest to take a look at...
Concurrent jurisdiction and its consequences in context of enforcement of interim measures of protection in arbitral proceedings
The purpose of this article is to analyze the issue of concurrent jurisdiction between a state court and an arbitral tribunal as well as between a state court and an emergency arbitrator (EA) in the perspective of Polish...
Sprawozdanie z konferencji naukowej pt. „Śląskie Forum Mediacji i Arbitrażu” w Katowicach (17.10.2014 r.)
Konferencja naukowa pt.: „Śląskie Forum Mediacji i Arbitrażu” została zorganizowana 17.10.2014 r. przez Fundację Wydziału Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Śląskiego „Facultas Iuridica” z okazji otwarcia Śląskiego Centr...
Dowód z opinii biegłego w postępowaniu rozpoznawczym a postępowanie mediacyjne wszczęte na podstawie postanowienia sądu o skierowaniu stron do mediacji.
The aim of this article is to explore the role of an expert in mediation. An expert is most obviously needed in mediation when parties realize they need additional information to evaluate settlement. The author presents...