Screening in Public Health and Clinical Care: Similarities and Differences in Definitions, Types, and Aims – A Systematic Review

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 3

Abstract

Introduction: The concept of screening can be many times misleading to many people. This may be partly due to the way screening is described and explained in textbooks and journal articles. Aim: To review prominent public health and epidemiology textbooks, dictionaries, and relevant journal publications for definitions and examples of screening, with the aim of identifying common usages and concepts, as well as sources of potential confusion. Materials and Methods: Commonly available epidemiology and public health textbooks and peer reviewed journals were searched for definitions and examples of screening. The search located seven journal articles, 10 textbooks, and one dictionary. The search platforms used were Pubmed, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Medline-OVID and Scopus under the Epidemiology and Biostatics subject head listed with Life Sciences. Results: Descriptions of screening give varying emphasis to whether it is a test or a program, the aims of screening, the setting in which it is conducted, eligibility criteria, who initiates and who is intended to benefit and whether the condition being screened is an infectious or chronic disease or a riskelevated state. Four essentially different ‘types’ of screening are described, using seven terms and occasionally contradictory examples. The detection of asymptomatic infectious cases is gradually changing from screening to surveillance as part of infection control. Conclusion: Voluntary screening programs rely on high participation to be effective and support and trust of the public are essential for the continued success of the public health profession. Consistent terminology is important for patients, providers and policymakers to understand what screening is and is not. Clear definitions are needed if we are to evaluate and communicate the risks and benefits of screening in public health.

Authors and Affiliations

Mark Speechley, Abraham Kunnilathu, Eby Aluckal, M S BALAKRISHNA, Benoy Mathew, Eldhose K George

Keywords

Related Articles

Expression of COX-2 in Carcinoma Breast

ABSTRACT Introduction: Early detection of breast cancer with chemoprevention is needed to decrease cancer related mortality at an early stage. The role of Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in carcinogenesis and tumour progression...

Unusual Clinical Presentations in Early-Onset Childhood Sarcoidosis: A Correlation or Coincidence?

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease which frequently affects young adults. Because of its rarity, the exact incidence and prevalence of childhood sarcoidosis is not known. It mostly affects children of old...

Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) after Thoracic Surgery: The Role of Estimated GFR

Introducton: Little is known about the prognostic utility of preoperative estimated GFR (eGFR) on perioperative Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) in apparently lower risk patients undergoing...

Erdheim-Chester Disease: Utility of 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography

Abstract Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) is a rare non Langerhans cell histiocytosis of unknown origin with multiorgan involvement. We report a case of a man who presented to us with haematuria, asthenia, fever, nausea an...

Oxidative Stress, DNA Damage and Serum Vitamin D Levels in Prediabetes

ABSTRACT Introduction: Prediabetes or intermediate hyperglycaemia is a high risk condition with blood glucose levels higher than the normal glycaemic values but lower than the Diabetes Mellitus (DM) diagnostic value. Ind...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP334341
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24811.9419
  • Views 109
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mark Speechley, Abraham Kunnilathu, Eby Aluckal, M S BALAKRISHNA, Benoy Mathew, Eldhose K George (2017). Screening in Public Health and Clinical Care: Similarities and Differences in Definitions, Types, and Aims – A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(3), 1-4. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-334341