SOCIAL INSTITUTES AND ART
Journal Title: Вісник Черкаського університетету. Серія Філософія - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 1
Abstract
Introduction. Theoretical analysis of the artistic and historical process is an important problem for aesthetics. Cultural analysis makes it possible to see the dependence of artistic structures on the socio-economic conditions of society, to understand the peculiarity of their phenomenological and ontological status. The social-historical context gives a certain specificity to the social forms of being of art, defines its internal structure. Art engages in the creation and operation of any form of culture. Purpose. The development of art is a necessary process of adapting society and culture to a situation that is conditioned by the causes of extracurricular significance. This situation forces us to reconstruct the picture of the development of art, created by classical aesthetics and formal art studies. The aim is to study the analysis of socio-cultural conditionality of art on the example of the creative work of Russian historian Vladimir Propp and British art historian Michael Baxandall. Results. According to V. Propa, the fairy tale must be correlated with the social institutions of the past and look for its origins in them. Thus, in particular, the fairy tale depicts somewhat different from modern forms of marriage.The forms of marriage in a fairy tale should be analyzed and found that arrangement, and the phase of social development, on which these forms are really available. Arguing that the fairy-tale must be correlated with historical reality, V. Propp sees in his fairy-tale not only the reflection of reality, but also the features of the archaic thinking. Baxandall explores the cultural context of Italian art of the 15th century. In particular, the aesthetic perception of a person of Italian Quattrocento is conditioned by religious institutions, peculiarities of economic activity. Conclusion. Forms of human sensuality are formed on the basis of certain cultural institutions. Thanks to our involvement in the common system of symbolic forms, which we call culture, it becomes possible to join the private system, which we call art and which in fact is only one of the spheres of culture. Therefore, the theory of art is at the same time a theory of culture, and not an independent discipline.
Authors and Affiliations
Mykola FEDORENKO
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP453282
- DOI 10.31651/2076-5894-2018-1-97-102
- Views 104
- Downloads 0
FEATURES OF THE MEDIEVAL PARADIGM OF TECHNIQUE
Introduction. Each historical epoch is a kind of world-view arena of struggle and confrontation of different types of world-views that shape the world outlook picture of world with their sensation of world, perception an...
The man in paradigma «of the symbolical forms» of E. Каssirеr.
The article is devoted to the problem of interpretation of man through the prism of E. Cassirer’s philosophy of symbolic forms and disclosure of heuristic value of this approach in the context of modern civilization proc...
PARADOXES OF TOLERANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF WORDLY WISDOM
Introduction. The article is dedicated to the tolerance in interpersonal and interethnic relations on the background of the humanization of the community, search of effective methods combining individual and universal va...
FREEDOM AS THE BASIC LIBERAL PRINCIPLE
Introduction. Nowadays freedom is one of the most important problems. Today it is observed not only as the main value of human and society, but also as a guarantee and condition of economic prosperity and formation of so...
NEW MEDIA AND THE POSSIBILITIES OF A DIALOGUE IN MASS RELIGIOUS COMMUNICATION
Introduction. Information society and mass culture are actively influencing on all types of communication. Religion adapts to a new communicative environment and offers its religious mass media. They combine the mass cha...