Solidarity; Syncretism of Peace and Friendship

Journal Title: The Journal of Human Rights - Year 2010, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

Considered as a fundamental virtue in the classical political thought, “friendship” even outshined the other important virtues like “justice”. However, the emergence of modernity and the consequent epistemological rupture caused to the prevalence of other concepts as “security” and “peace” over “friendship”. Thus, humans, as the wolves of each other, forgot about classical virtues including “friendship”. However, the contemporary criticism of modern thought shows the necessity of revival and reinterpretation of classical political concepts. Meanwhile, returning to the importance of “friendship” in the classical thought, Jürgen Habermas syncretizes “friendship” and “peace”, believing that with making “solidarity” central, those two concepts can be realized simultaneously in the society. Thus, “solidarity” is the source of legitimate norm establishing in the modern society. yle='font-size: 11.0pt;letter-spacing:-.2pt'>Plato’s opposition to democracy –indeed only to a certain kind of it– shows that there is no necessary correlation between justice and peace on the one hand and democracy on the other hand. In this paper, having sated Plato’s view on justice, peace and democracy we will show what he regards as pre-conditions to reach justice and peace. چکیده «دوستی» از جمله فضیلت‌های بنیادین در اندیشه سیاسی کلاسیک بوده است که حتی فضیلت‌های مهمی چون عدالت را نیز تحت‌الشعاع قرار می‌داد. با ظهور اندیشه‌ مدرن و بروز گسست معرفت‌شناختی، دوستی به محاق رفت و مقولاتی چون امنیت و صلح محوریت یافتند. بر این اساس، انسان‌ها به مثابه «گرگ» یکدیگر، فضیلت‌های کلاسیک را به فراموشی سپردند. اما نقدهای معاصر بر اندیشه مدرن، ضرورت احیا و بازخوانی انتقادی مقولات سیاسی کلاسیک را نشان می‌دهد. در این میان، یورگن هابرماس، با بازگشت به اهمیت مقوله «دوستی» در اندیشه کلاسیک، آن‌را با مقوله مدرنِ «صلح» پیوند می‌دهد و با محوریت بخشیدن به مقوله «همبستگی» در پی تحقق همزمان آنها در جامعه است. بر این اساس، «همبستگی» منبع هنجارگذاری مشروع در اجتماع است.

Authors and Affiliations

Seyed Mohsen Alavipour, Morteza Bahrani

Keywords

Related Articles

Protection against Religious Hatred under the UN ICCPR and the European Convention System

This paper will explore the exact relation between the right to freedom of expression and the prohibition of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. Considering the precise...

Religious Identity, Difference and Human Rights: the Crucial Role of Hermeneutics

Two fundamental questions tend to dominate religious discursive narratives and their interpretations: What duties and which rights are conferred by God applicable to all humans as the creation of God and regardless of th...

Human Rights, Human Security and Political Theologies

Human rights, particularly in the form of international human rights law, intersect with religion and peace at foundational levels, as symbolically highlighted by the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Th...

Mechanisms for the Proximity Between the Perspectives of the Shiite Jurisprudence and the International Human Rights System Regarding Corporal Punishment of Children

One of the challenging issues which families and societies face in rearing and upbringing is how to treat children’s misbehavior In Islamic perspective, especially Shiite jurisprudence, which is considered to be the main...

An Investigation on Legal Protection for Women Victims of Climate Change; Studying African Regional Documents

In recent decades, paying attention to the subject of Climate Change and its destructive effects on different countries around the world have caused regular activities as holding international conferences, and ratifying...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP303200
  • DOI -
  • Views 123
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Seyed Mohsen Alavipour, Morteza Bahrani (2010). Solidarity; Syncretism of Peace and Friendship. The Journal of Human Rights, 4(2), 21-40. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-303200