Soul or Mind? Some Remarks on Explanation in Cognitive Science
Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 2
Abstract
In the article author analyses the extent to which it is possible to regard the Aristotelian conception of the soul as actually necessary and applicable for modern neuroscience. The framework in which this objective is going to be accomplished is provided by the idea of the coexistence of the “manifest” and “scientific” images of the world and persons, as introduced by Wilfrid Sellars. In subsequent sections, author initially formulates an answer to the questions of what it is that Aristotle sought to explain with his conception of soul as formal cause, and how this notion could be portrayed in terms drawn from contemporary neurological science. It is author’s intention to show that no other concepts—be they the Cartesian “mind” or a Chalmers-style “self”—come anywhere close to matching the breadth of scope of Aristotelian “soul”. At the same time, though, analysis carried out here do not intend to undertake any kind of defence of the soul as a spiritual entity of the sort popular where religious faith is concerned, namely as an entity separable from the body, immortal, and inimitably tied to God. Then, in the second major part of the article, author analyses the extent to which the Aristotelian conception of the soul can be thought of as involving criteria of the sort that we encounter in the contemporary theory of strong emergence. According to the author the theory of strong emergence has, as a heuristic theory, quite general predictive and explanatory power as regards the field of human thought and behaviour.
Authors and Affiliations
Józef Bremer
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP327435
- DOI 10.12775/SetF.2017.023
- Views 112
- Downloads 0
Introduction to the Special Issue of “Scientia et Fides” on Mariano Artigas
The occasion for the elaboration of this issue was the tenth anniversary of the death of Mariano Artigas, which took place on December 23, 2006. A period of ten years is a good excuse to do something allowed by the acade...
Science as a Form of Life and Cross-disciplinarity: Mariano Artigas and Charles S. Peirce
According to Charles S. Peirce and to Mariano Artigas, science is the collective and cooperative activity of all those whose lives are animated by the desire to discover the truth. The particular sciences are branches of...
Czy przyroda może mieć intencje?
Recenzja książki
Evolution in Court. A Federal Judge Defines Science
This article highlights certain recurring themes in Mariano Artigas’s works by examining a judicial decision made in the United States in 1982 concerning the teaching of “creation-science” alongside “evolution-science” i...
Razón práctica y primer principio de la ley natural en Suárez
Practical reason and first principle of the natural law in Suárez The aim of this paper is to examine the Suarecian theory of practical reason and its first principle, which is also the first principle of natural law. A...