Sprzeciw sumienia w orzecznictwie ETPC (na podstawie wyroku Wielkiej Izby z 7 lipca 2011 r. w sprawie Bayatyan v. Armenia)
Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2016, Vol 134, Issue 3
Abstract
The article provides an analysis of judgment of Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights of 7 July 2011 in the case of Bayatyan v. Armenia, in which the Court, based on the “living instrument” doctrine, gives — inter alia — a new creative interpretation of Article 9 of the Convention. In this interpretation the Court broadened its scope of protection to include conscientious objectors, to autonomous extent, within the full meaning of this prerequisite not functionally limited to matters relating to the armed service, which might be indicated by the scope of the case considered.
Authors and Affiliations
Jacek Falski
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP218222
- DOI -
- Views 79
- Downloads 0
Stany nadzwyczajne w porządku konstytucyjnym Ukrainy — stan wojenny 2018 roku
In this publication, the author analyzes legal norms concerning extraordinary states in the Constitution of Ukraine. The problems are examined based on Ukrainian and foreign constitutional and statutory solutions. In the...
Uzasadnienie dynamicznej wykładni Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności — pytania krytyczne
In the light of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms is a living instrument “which must be interpreted in the light of present-day...
Projekt ustawy o zmianie Konstytucji RP w zakresie ochrony lasów państwowych
This article deals with the proposal of constitutional amendment submitted in 2014 (A bill to amend the Constitution, Sejm Paper No. 2374), to rule out ownership transformation of state forests. The author examines the m...
Trybunał Konstytucyjny w sporze z prezydentem, rządem i parlamentem w 2015 r.
Analyzed herein is the Constitutional Tribunal’s judgment of 3 December 2015 (ref. no. K 34/15). The Tribunal considered the issue of consistence with the Constitution of provisions of the act on the Constitutional Tribu...
Skarga nadzwyczajna — dopełniający czy konkurencyjny wobec skargi konstytucyjnej instrument ochrony konstytucyjnych wolności i praw jednostki.
On 3 April 2018, a new law on the Supreme Court went into force, introducing a new institution — an extraordinary complaint. According to the intention of its authors, the construction of extraordinary complaint emphasis...