Strategia Dionizjusza Starszego w latach 405-396 p.n.e. a zarzuty stawiane mu w “Bibliotece historycznej” Diodora Sycylijskiego

Journal Title: Studia Europaea Gnesnensia - Year 2012, Vol 5, Issue

Abstract

In the ancient times, Dionysius was repeatedly accused of starting conflicts and supporting Carthaginians in order to wage an “endless war”, which permitted him to consolidate power in his domain. The specific facts which were to testify to the tyrant’s betrayal, were included by un unknown author in a speech which was to have been allegedly delivered by a Syracusan oppositionist Theodoros. (D. S. XIV 65-69). The arguments of the orator aimed against the tyrant are biased, and perhaps even partially false. Many of the ruler’s decisions, which allegedly were to attest to his betrayal might be perceived in the categories of the ‘choice of a lesser evil”, for instance in the case of the Syracusan retreat fromGela. The orator asserted that Dionysius clandestinely agreed to conditions of the peace treaty which were unfavourable for the Greeks, a treaty which ended the first Carthaginian war; he does not mention however, that it was a run of defeats for the Hellenians. To a certain extent, one could agree with the charges made by Theodoros with regard to the policy of the Syracusan ruler towards the polis of the Great Greece. At first, the tyrant attempted to maintain the position of the commander-in-chief of all Hellenians fromItalyandSicilywho decided to fight against the Carthaginians. When this ambition failed, he realised that one day he would have to confront the forces of the ever more hostile Region and its allies, therefore he consistently prepared for the inevitable clash. He began a game with the potentially hostile polis of the Great Greece, which in turn made attempts to start cooperation in order to from a common front againstCarthage, simultaneously taking successive steps with a view to a final battle with them.

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Nawrot

Keywords

Related Articles

Klasyka Weimarska — nie tylko męski fenomen kulturowy?

The article is an attempt to take notice of and highlight the role of women in the making of the Germany’s one of a kind cultural phenomenon, the Weimar Classicism. This standpoint, insufficiently presented in Polish lit...

Familia y crisis del matrimonio en Espana

In the course of mere three decades (1975–2005) Spain experienced transformations in almost all spheres of social life, which not only deepened the heterogeneity of forms in social life, but also led to a crisis of marri...

Atlas personifikacji żeńskich, męskich i geograficznych na imperialnych monetach rzymskich

Recenzja książki: Franziska Schmidt-Dick, Typenatlas der römischen Reichsprägung von Augustus bis Aemilianus. Erster Band: Weibliche Darstellungen. (Veröffentlichungen derNumismatischen Kommission 38 = Denkschriften der...

Problematyka Powstania Wielkopolskiego 1918/1919 w wybranych dziedzinach kultury (w literaturze i twórczości plastycznej)

Apart from historical studies and monographs, cultural initiatives are an important way of commemorating the Greater Poland Uprising of 1918-1919. Among such undertakings, literary works and products of visual arts are p...

Krajobraz. Próba ujęcia w perspektywie interdyscyplinarnej

The main purpose of the article is to try and locate the meeting points, but also the substantial discrepancies developed in the course of history, the aesthetics which devises its own notion of landscape and the empiric...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP169388
  • DOI -
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michał Nawrot (2012). Strategia Dionizjusza Starszego w latach 405-396 p.n.e. a zarzuty stawiane mu w “Bibliotece historycznej” Diodora Sycylijskiego. Studia Europaea Gnesnensia, 5(), 9-31. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-169388