SYMBOLISM OF SPEECH AND DIALOGICAL PARADIGM IN PHILOSOPHY

Abstract

Introduction. The urgency of this article theme is determined by the searching of modern philosophy, cognitive sciences, linguistics, social and political philosophy, psycholinguistics in the problem area of the dialogic guideline in general communication, as well as language, speech and discourse. This, in turn, leads to the subjects of philosophical anthropology. Purpose. The aim of the study is to determine the relationship between speech symbolism, symbolic constructions of discourse and the dialogic instruction in speech, discourse and thinking. Methods used in the study: textual analysis of sources, analytical methods for considering philosophical discourse and paradigm guidelines in philosophical currents, hermeneutic approach and problematization of differences between language and speech. The results of the study allow us to find out the essential correlation and the relationship between the symbolic structures of speech and language and the initial guidelines of the dialogical paradigm in the philosophy of the twentieth century. It is found out that the fundamental boundary concepts of the category of the philosophy of dialogue usually function as symbolic constructions. This gives the philosophy of dialogue the features of similarity to religion and ethics. The originality and novelty of the study are that an attempt has been made to outline the interdependence of linguistic forms and means of dialogue and its philosophical content. Also, the concepts-philosophers-symbols of space, time, stay, eternity, encounters and their symbolic functional and ontologizability are clarified. Conclusions. The results of the study allow us to conclude about the linguistic nature of the philosophy of dialogue and her inherent appeal to the symbol and symbolic structures of speech and language. It was also proposed the ways of overcoming the subject-object dichotomy within the paradigm of dialogical philosophy. This overcoming is possible due to the symbolic nature of dialogical speech, the accentuation of the principle of attitude, and not the essence.

Authors and Affiliations

Pavlo КRETOV, Olena КRETOVА

Keywords

Related Articles

INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION THEORIES: GENESIS, CONTRADICTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT

Introduction. The development of any society in the world today is dependent on the ability to interact, collaborate and obtain knowledge from the international community. Any interaction on this level provides intercult...

SYMBOLISM OF SPEECH AND DIALOGICAL PARADIGM IN PHILOSOPHY

Introduction. The urgency of this article theme is determined by the searching of modern philosophy, cognitive sciences, linguistics, social and political philosophy, psycholinguistics in the problem area of the dialogic...

THE MOTIF OF THE “SECRET” AS CULTURE GENESIS PHENOMENON IN INTERDISCIPLINARY DIALOGUE OF LITERATURE AND PAINTING

Introduction. The article deals with the phenomenon of interdisciplinary dialogue of arts as an example of cultural and aesthetic interconnectivity of literature and painting. It was studied the language of poetic and pi...

CATEGORICAL CHARACTER OF RESPONSIBILITY IN THE SPACE OF REVOLUTION (ON THE BASIS OF SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL AND ETHICAL ANALYSIS OF OTTO VON BISMARCK’S ACTIVITY)

For any society modernization is a revolutionary change. However the question of whether, in what society would be the population of the previous society remains sharply debating. About the role of the concept of the pro...

ESCHATOLOGY AS A PART OF CULTURAL SPACE IN THE CHRISTIAN PICTURE OF THE WORLD OF G. P. FEDOTOV

Introduction. In the eschatology picture of the world the questions of culture and life of man have special status and special decision. The reasons of sociocultural crisis of society consist in the incorrect understandi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP453269
  • DOI 10.31651/2076-5894-2018-1-66-73
  • Views 122
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Pavlo КRETOV, Olena КRETOVА (2018). SYMBOLISM OF SPEECH AND DIALOGICAL PARADIGM IN PHILOSOPHY. Вісник Черкаського університетету. Серія Філософія, 1(1), 66-73. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-453269