The 2013 Developments in Belgian Arbitration Law
Journal Title: ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja - Year 2015, Vol 1, Issue 29
Abstract
On 1 September 2013, a new arbitration law entered into force in Belgium (“2013 Law” or “new law”) . This new law applies to all arbitration proceedings that were launched after 1 September 2013 and is by far the most extensive reform of Belgium’s arbitration legislation to date . Arbitration law in Belgium dates from 1806, but the first arbitration statute in the modern era was introduced in the Belgian Judicial Code (“BJC”) in 1972 . Since then, it has been amended only twice: in 1985 and in 1998 . The 1985 amendment concerned solely the famous exclusion of any award annulment proceedings, which ¬applied always if none of the parties to the proceedings had Belgian citizenship, was domiciled in Belgium, or had its seat or branch in Belgium . But this exclusion was abolished afterwards in an amendment to Belgian arbitration law in 1998 (“1998 Law” or “old law”). The 1998 Law had many amendments that took into account the developments in foreign arbitration laws. The 1998 Law also considered the ¬UNCITRAL Model Law, but it did not transpose the latter . The amendments in the 2013 Law introduced a comprehensive reform of Belgian arbitration law and were based on a nearly-complete transposition of the ¬UNCITRAL Model Law . The 2013 amendments, like the amendments contained in the earlier reforms, are meant to promote Belgium as an arbitration-friendly country and to encourage international parties to choose Belgium as the seat of their arbitration proceedings . To achieve this end, these changes focus on modern legal methods that increase flexibility and efficiency of arbitration proceedings .
Authors and Affiliations
Jean-Pierre Fierens, Joanna Kolber
Budowanie przewagi strategicznej organizacji poprzez wprowadzenie standardu mediacji
A dynamically changing company’s development factors result in seeking new strategic management trends and new competitive advantage factors. One of the crucial tendency of raising the quality of both within the organiza...
Uwagi na tle regulacji postępowań ADR w sporach konsumenckich w świetle ustawy o pozasądowym rozwiązywaniu sporów konsumenckich
Reflections on ADR proceedings against the background of the out-of-court resolving for consumer disputes act The Out-of-court Resolving for Consumer Disputes Act that entered into force on 10 January 2017 brought in thr...
Current Trends in Arbitration in Austria
The Vienna Rules 2013 offer new features and ensure that arbitral proceedings remain flexible, expeditious and fair, thus responding to the needs of international users. Especially the new rules on multi-party proceeding...
ADR w sporach konsumenckich w świetle implementacji dyrektywy 2013/11/UE
The article raises a problem of the EU directive no. 2013/11/EU on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) with consumers and its implementation into the Polish legal system. Currently, in Poland, the work on a new law on A...
Anwaltsvergleich – niemiecka ugoda adwokacka jako wzór dla polskiego ustawodawcy?
Attorneys’ settlement (Anwaltsvergleich) is a semi-out-of-court way of resolution of disputes, specific for the German civil law. The paper aims to depict its regulation according to the German civil procedure code (ZPO)...