THE AZERBAIJANI OFFICIAL State DISCOURSE ON THE ARMENIAN-AZERBAIjANI CONFLICT: BLOCKAGES TO PEACE

Abstract

The intractable conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the first in a series of inter-ethnic wars to arise in the final years of the Soviet Union, has lasted for three decades and has gone through several violent episodes inflicting widespread death and destruction. Against the background of a long period of tried-and-failed resolution attempts, the conflict has led to the fostering of grievances, prejudice, long-lasting societal trauma and victimhood. Starting from these considerations, this paper seeks to emphasize the way in which, in the official state discourse, the Azerbaijani leaders concentrate mainly on their own traumas and victim status. This type of discourse sets off a unilateral solution to the conflict, considered the only right option, thus preventing any dialogue with the Armenian side, and implicitly any resolution of the conflict. From a methodological perspective, I have selected several official speeches belonging to the Azerbaijani leaders between 1994-2016 and held at various national and international forums. The content analysis of the Azerbaijani official speeches will be complemented by the data collected through semi-structured interviews with Azerbaijani experts in the field of International Relations during a field research to Azerbaijan. The paper concludes that trauma and victimhood as reflected in the official Azerbaijani state discourse function as blockages to peace and hinder any changes in the way Azerbaijani leaders represent the conflict and its resolution.

Authors and Affiliations

Lavinia BADULESCU

Keywords

Related Articles

SHANG YANG 商鞅 AND LEGALIST 法家 REFORM IN THE ANCIENT CHINESE STATE OF QIN 秦

Legalism has played a major role in the history of the Chinese legal and governmental tradition. One of the major exponents and formulators of this school of thought in ancient times was Shang Yang, an official in the st...

THE CRIMINAL NORM IN DIFFERENT LEGAL SYSTEMS – COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

This paper aims to analyze the structure and evolution of the criminal norm in the context of various existing legal systems at the global level, showing both the similarities and the differences between these systems. T...

PLEA AGREEMENT DURING THE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL

The Plea Agreement is one of the latest institutions and one of the special procedures introduced by the New Romanian Criminal Procedure Code. The Romanian procedure law adopted it because the State wanted a reduced cost...

THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE PROCEDURE OF PRELIMINARY CHAMBER

The paper addresses from the theoretical point of view, but also taking into consideration some practical references, one of the most controversial procedures covered by the Code of Criminal Procedure in force - namely t...

BRIEF COMMENTS ON ISSUES CONCERNING THE FORFEITURE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE IN THE CIVIL TRIAL

The Code of Civil Procedure lays down a series of timeframes in which the parties may propose the evidence under the sanction of the forfeiture of this right and, on the other hand, at the written stage regulated by art....

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP309495
  • DOI -
  • Views 143
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Lavinia BADULESCU (2018). THE AZERBAIJANI OFFICIAL State DISCOURSE ON THE ARMENIAN-AZERBAIjANI CONFLICT: BLOCKAGES TO PEACE. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 1001-1008. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-309495