The Definitions of Individuality and ROK Kungmin (國民) in the Political Philosophy of the Incipient Republic of Korea

Journal Title: International Journal of Korean History - Year 2011, Vol 16, Issue 1

Abstract

ying the ROK’s aseity. And there still remained the threat of popular practices. The South Korean people got indulged in things concerned with the individual self and were indifferent to state affairs and the ROK. In the face of this popular mentality, the ROK had to define individuality and kungmin in order to pull its kungmin out from their individual worlds into the public sphere of the state and state affairs. For this purpose, the ROK ruling elite presented their own definition of the individual as a national and state being who could not exist without the nation and the state. This meant that individuality was relegated to “secondary status” in relation to “a supreme society” viz. the state. The identification of the individual as an existing only within the statelaid the ground for the state project of producing ROK kungmin. The patriotic deed, according to ROK political philosophy, was a way to realize one’s own nature, completing one’s self. This meant that kungmin came to be defined as a public and “organic existence which, overcoming ego, unifies itself in the state doctrine”and as “an unified body of individuality and totality, the individual person and the state under the national spirit”. This definition offered the R. O. K. ideational and cultural resources available to the political body not only for its security interest but also for its statehood. It supplied the South Korean polity with the discursive resources which would help the political entity to transform South Korean people into ROK kungmin necessary for the full and safe mobilization of the people for the ROK’s agendas of its security and development. The discursive resources could relieve the ROK of the dangers of resorting to oppressive means and denying popular sovereignty, protecting the ROK’s modern statehood whose fundamental political criterion was believed to be popular sovereignty. In this sense, we can say that the definition lent the ROK discursive support to its assumption of modern statehood. This constituted the historical meaning of the definition to the part of the ROK.

Authors and Affiliations

Chong-myong Im

Keywords

Related Articles

The Tokyo Trial and the Question of Colonial Responsibility: Zainichi Korean Reactions to Allied Justice in Occupied Japan

This article examines how the zainichi Korean media and organizations responded to the Tokyo Trial and its pursuit of war responsibility. Their critiques of the Tokyo Trial often presented a critical insight from the per...

Historical Characteristics of Korea's Social Democracy

Socialism is an ideology that was formed and organized in the process of the political movement of modern western Europe. For its part, social democracy, founded in the late 19th century, carried the same meaning as s...

The Nipponophone Company and Record Consumption in Colonial Korea

This paper is a history of the Korean record industry in the 1910s and 20s, focusing on the record company Nihon Chikuonki Shōkai (Nitchiku hereafter). As the first record company in the Japanese empire and the only one...

Mongols and Western Asian in the Late Koryŏ Ruling Stratum

The Mongol conquests in the thirteenth century reached far outside the sphere of traditional Chinese influence and provided conditions for unprecedented large‐scale movements of people and ideas. The period also offer...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP26362
  • DOI -
  • Views 461
  • Downloads 24

How To Cite

Chong-myong Im (2011). The Definitions of Individuality and ROK Kungmin (國民) in the Political Philosophy of the Incipient Republic of Korea. International Journal of Korean History, 16(1), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-26362