The fairness of punishment: myth or reality

Journal Title: Юридические науки и образование - Year 2017, Vol 51, Issue 51

Abstract

It is necessity to obey the laws of the state is the foundation and key principle of fairness in society. But it is equally important that the scales of justice are fair and correct, and that the one of who holds them in his hand maintains a balance of weights and does not abuse his position for inappropriate purposes. A fair retribution, i.e. the visible equality between crime and punishment, should represent a line over which the legislator has no right to cross. Crossing this line would mean crossing the boundary between the moral and immoral use of punishment as a means of achieving political and economic goals, and not preventing manifestations of crime. The proportionality between crime and punishment requires, first of all, a requirement for data reporting on the relative severity between various crimes -since the only true measure of crime from the point of view of the legislator is the harm that it brings to the nation. The possibility of the empirical measurement of social danger therefore seems more appropriate at this stage for each particular crime. The current task of the theory of judicial activity is the development of theoretically correct, appropriate and practically implemented indicators by which judges can determine the social danger of crime in order to maximise the individualisation of punishment.

Authors and Affiliations

Ilham Rahimov

Keywords

Related Articles

Cyber security is an integral part of state security

One of the most troubling issues in the globalization era is the issue of security and its provision.It is now possible to note that cyber security is becoming a strategic national issue that affects all levels of govern...

The text of the Criminal Code as a matter of hermeneutical analysis (for example, the text of section XVII of the Special Part of “Crime in the area of performance and professional activities related to the provision of public services”)

It is considered the problems of the text of the Criminal Code as a matter of hermeneutical analysis. Consider the example of the text of section XVII of the Criminal Code of Ukraine “Crimes in the sphere of performance...

Reasons of crime and objective opportunities of punishment

Crime existed and exists in all societies independently on their socio-political system and its reasons have caused by the same factors – social, socio-economic, socio-political and other ones. Therefore, a level of crim...

On some criteria of admissibility of tactical techniques of witnesses’ interrogation

Ethic and psychological basis of an interrogation’s production should be directed not only to cognition of the objective regularities in the aspect of moral and scientific issues of criminalistical tactics but also they...

Criminalistical model of evasion from payment of customs duties linked with smuggling

It is considered the material and mental models evasion from payment of customs duties associated with smuggling, their structural elements. It is analyzed the stages of criminal activities committed on them action. It i...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP184096
  • DOI 10.25108/2304-1730-1749.iolr.2017.51.237-280
  • Views 84
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ilham Rahimov (2017). The fairness of punishment: myth or reality. Юридические науки и образование, 51(51), 260-280. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-184096