The Gazprom Case: Lessons of the Past For the Future

Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2017, Vol 10, Issue 16

Abstract

Under the EU Merger Regulation, if the Commission has concerns that a merger may significantly affect competition in the European Union, the merging companies may propose modifications to the project that would guarantee continued competition on the market. The Commission may declare a concentration compatible with the common market following such a modification by the parties and attach to its decision conditions and obligations intended to ensure that the undertakings comply with the commitments. In other words, commitments have to be offered by the parties but the Commission may introduce conditions and obligations if they are required to ensure the enforceability of commitments. Meanwhile the scope to propose merger modifications and the level of discretion of the competition authority are quite different under the Law on Competition of the Republic of Lithuania, adopted almost two decades ago. The goal of this paper is to reveal those differences and, with the help of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania in the Gazprom case, to explain how this may impact future cases.

Authors and Affiliations

Dalia Višinskienė, Justina Nasutavičienė

Keywords

Related Articles

Energy Security as a Priority for CEE countries. Is the King Naked?

he aim of this article is to assess the implementation process of the EU energy security policy in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. In the EU, energy security remains a crucial issue for...

Maciej Gac, Group litigation as an instrument of competition law enforcement – analysis based on European, French and Polish experiences, University of Warsaw Faculty of Management Press,Warsaw 2017, 532 pages

A key theme of the book under review here is the engagement of individuals (mainly consumers) in the enforcement of competition law. The involvement of consumers in a competition case, and their will to initiate proceedi...

Provisions of the Damages Directive on Limitation Periods and their Implementation in CEE Countries

The article analyses the provisions on limitation of antitrust damages actions set out in Directive 2014/104/EU on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law p...

Grounds for Private Enforcement of Albanian Competition Law

Infringements of competition law can cause serious harm to both consumers and undertakings. Aside from the development of public enforcement of competition law, much focus has been placed in recent...

Conference on EU Competition Law and the New Private Enforcement Regime: First Experiences from its implementation. Uppsala, 13–14 June 2017 (conference report)

On 13–14 June 2017, a two-day conference entitled ‘EU Competition Law and the New Private Enforcement Regime: First Experiences from its Implementation’ was held at Uppsala University (Sweden). The c...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP318454
  • DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.3
  • Views 51
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dalia Višinskienė, Justina Nasutavičienė (2017). The Gazprom Case: Lessons of the Past For the Future. Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 10(16), 57-76. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-318454