The Huawei Case and Its Aftermath: a New Test for a New Type of Abuse
Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2017, Vol 10, Issue 16
Abstract
Competition law sets limits on the exercise of intellectual property rights by dominant companies, namely in cases involving standard essential patents (SEPs). This article will examine the framework for SEP owners’ right to seek an injunction, discussing competitive problems that such situations may cause as well as the solutions adopted by the European Institutions, comparing them with the US and Japanese approach, and finally reflecting upon the opportunity for a new test for a new type of abuse. Although the three legal orders – US, EU and Japan – apply different laws establishing a general presumption against injunctions in SEPs encumbered with FRAND commitments, their goal is the same: to protect the interest of the SEP holder to obtain a remuneration without an abusive recourse to injunctions. I will argue that, in the EU, the Huawei case created a new test for a new type of abuse, improving the comprehensibility and certainty for the companies involved in standardization across Europe and allowing the harmonization of national judicial solutions regarding the seeking of injunctions in the SEPs context. In spite of some uncertainties, the new test clarifies the role that competition rules should play in cases of abuses by SEPs owners.
Authors and Affiliations
Sofia Oliveira Pais
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP318383
- DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.1
- Views 44
- Downloads 0
The European Competition Network in the European Administrative System: Theoretical Concerns
The public administration of the European Union (EU) is a sui generis multi-level structure under constant development. After five decades of successful functioning, the European Union still lacks a coherent and comprehe...
Consensual Dispute Resolution in the Damage Directive. Implementation in CEE Countries
This paper discusses the use of consensual dispute resolution for the purpose of antitrust damage claims as introduced by the Directive. It presents these type of claims in a broader context of arbitration (or ADR), in c...
6th International PhD Students’ Conference on Competition Law. Białystok, 27 April 2017 (conference report)
The 6th International PhD Students’ Conference on Competition Law took place on 27 April 2017 in Białystok, Poland. It was organized by the Department of Public Economic Law at the Faculty...
Design of Regulatory Contracts – Example of the Urban Transport Industry
The present article discusses economic issues related to the design of optimal regulatory contracts on the example of the urban public transport industry. It highlights the importance of the...
Joint and Several Liability of Competition Law Infringers in the Legislation of Central and Eastern European Member States
The study reviews the provisions of the Directive by, first, presenting its general rule – joint and several liability – and then its two exceptions, pointing out that albeit they contain similar solutions, these have di...