THE LIMITS OF THE ANTI-RELIGIOUS DISCOURSE IN THE SECOND REPUBLIC OF POLAND. THE REMARKS ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT VERDICT OF THE 5TH JULY 1938 AND THE RELEVANCE OF THE JUDGMENT TODAY
Journal Title: Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego - Year 2010, Vol 13, Issue 13
Abstract
The jurisdiction of the Supreme court in the interwar period was characterized by the high substantive level, and was often based on the multifaceted comparisons of the normative states in the legislature ranges. Not all decrees, however, were issued with equal care for details. One of the decrees, which ought to be re-examined, is the Supreme Court verdict of 5th July 1938, in which the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Second Instance, finding the accused guilty on the basis of article 174 of the Penal Code.: “Whoever blasphemes against God is to be convicted to up to five years of prison.” The accused had translated a book by a French thinker, undermining the divinity of Christ. The use of words like “lout” or “brawler” was considered a blasphemy. There are at least two mistakes in the reasoning of the Supreme Court. Firstly, it had not been clarified whether a translator, following the premises of his profession, committed the crime of helping or, having recognized the translation as a separate work on the basis of the copyright law, committed a crime completely different than that of the French author. Secondly, the attempt of mutual balancing the principles of religious equality and the freedom of speech had not been conducted. The Supreme Court verdict, which could be expressed in a better way, met the social need for justice. After reading the decree one may infer that the verdict convicting the accused was seemingly the only right verdict, irrespectively of the argumentation provided during the trial. Regardless of the mistakes, according the contemporary Penal Code (article 196), the main idea standing behind that Supreme Court verdict remains relevant up to nowadays: Polish legislature does not prohibit the speeches not complying with religion or even denying God’s existence, as long as the speeches are not blasphemous, that is their authors do not speak against God in insulting terms, do not “violate the worship that is to be paid to God” by means of an insult (…), contempt, despise and other affronts.
Authors and Affiliations
Maciej Mikuła
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP103267
- DOI -
- Views 218
- Downloads 0
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTERING INTO A LOAN AGREEMENT BY PARISH WITHOUT THE BISHOP'S CONSENT
The parish, under the art. 52 of the relationship between the State and the Catholic Church in Poland Act as art. 23 of the Concordat of 1998 is an entity in the course of civil law. There is a close connection between c...
ON FUNDING THE PURPOSES OF WORSHIP CONDUCTED BY CHURCHES AND OTHER RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS
One of the main pursuits of churches and other religious associations is to conduct religious worship. This aim needs financial and material resources that religious entities may acquire in various ways in accordance wit...
THE PERSPECTIVES OF CHANGING THE SYSTEM OF FUNDING CHURCHES AND OTHER RELIGIOUS DENOMINATIONS IN POLAND
The Concordat between the Republic of Poland and the Holy See, which is presently in force, comprises provisions anticipating a change in the model of funding church institutions in Poland. Even though that objective h...
PODSTAWY PRAWNE FUNKCJONOWANIA I DZIAŁALNOŚĆ BRACTWA NAJŚWIĘTSZEJ PANNY MARYI KRÓLOWEJ KORONY POLSKIEJ W KRAKOWIE
Z końcem XIX w. w Galicji funkcjonowało wiele organizacji i stowarzyszeń, z których część była związana z Kościołem katolickim i działała w oparciu o zasady wiary katolickiej, niosąc pomoc potrzebującym. Uwarunkowania...
A LEGAL OPINION ON THE APPLICATION OF A GROUP OF CHURCHES SUBMITTED TO THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS ON 15 FEBRUARY 2010
The opinion refers to the application dated 15 February 2010 submitted by a group of nine churches and other religious associations belonging to the Pentacostal Christian movement. The application was addressed to the Pr...