The Principle of Justice in Listening To the Evidence in Consumer Dispute through Arbitration in Indonesia

Journal Title: Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 3, Issue 8

Abstract

Abstract:The realization of the principle of justice in proving the settlement of consumer disputes through arbitration in Indonesia is important, with three reasons, namely first, there is a weakness of the consumer protection law because the formulation of substantial norms and formal law is contrary to other laws so that the formulation is not in the framework national legal system and difficult to be harmonized. Second, the legal norms for consumer dispute settlement with an inverse proof burden system have created injustice for consumers and producers and open up opportunities for other parties to manipulate adverse evidence. Third, no matter how well the consumer dispute resolution process, does not guarantee that justice is achieved unless the judge (arbitrator) is right and correctly divides the burden of proof and provides an assessment of the strength of the evidence submitted by the disputing party. Discussion of the problem of proof, using the normative legal research method that refers to norms and legal principles in the legislation or court decisions. This discussion is explorative on thought, concrete legal norms in the Indonesian consumer protection law and is prescriptive to offer the concept of problem solving of the problems presented. The conclusion of the discussion is that the consumer arbitration verification system in Indonesia is a model that comes from the presumption of liability principle with a reverse proof burden. The realization of justice in this system cannot be harmonized so that it needs to be adjusted to the principle of justice that is universally adhered to and the principle of justice characterized by the legal personality of the Indonesian nation, namely Pancasila justice. Keywords: Principles of Justice, Verification System, Consumer Disputes, Arbitration.

Authors and Affiliations

Azwir Agus, Tan Kamelo

Keywords

Related Articles

Investigating Human Health Implications of Surface and Ground Water Consumption in the Sokoto-Rima Floodplain, Sokoto, North-west Nigeria

This research investigated the surface and ground water quality in the Sokoto-Rima floodplain and determined the human health implications of consuming it. Five sample points were selected systematically, and at each sam...

The Accountability of Local Government’s Discretion in Resolving Illegal Mining in Bone Regency

Abstract: The purpose of this research is to analyze the accountability of local government's discretion in illegal mining in Bone Regency. The study used a more specific qualitative approach. Data collection is done by...

Purchase Decision Model: Analysis of Brand Image, Brand Awareness and Price (Case Study SMECO Indonesia SME products)

Abstract: This study aimed to determine the effect of brand image, brand awareness and price on purchasing decisions of products of SMEs in SMESCO Indonesia. Population in this study as many as 1340 people using Slovin’s...

A Sociolinguistic Study of Linguistic Sexism in English Proverbs

Abstract: Linguistic sexism exists in almost every aspect of social and cultural life. In recent years, it has become an important research object. Previous studies have covered the topic of linguistic sexism, but the re...

Workplace Stress and its Effect on Performance; Special Reference to Educational Sector

Abstract: Workplace stress is one of the most challenging issues in many institutions. Recently due to the competitive nature of many institutions in this global age, employers have placed more demands on employees work...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP400863
  • DOI -
  • Views 145
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Azwir Agus, Tan Kamelo (2018). The Principle of Justice in Listening To the Evidence in Consumer Dispute through Arbitration in Indonesia. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(8), 1007-1013. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-400863