The Study of Pronouncing Judgments in Court in Civil Litigation
Journal Title: Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 5
Abstract
Abstract: There are two modes in adjudicating judgments in China’s civil procedure act amendment 2012, namely sentencing judgments in court, or after court. The second mode is usually defined to the judges announce judgments on a fixed day in the near future. The above two ways of pronouncing are all have their application in judicial practice, but their application is interactive and in a mutual competition. In a long time, there exists the problem that the rate of pronouncing in court is extremely low while the utilization rate of pronouncing after court is increasingly applied inadequately. In addition, the current law has little concrete stipulations on appointed time of pronouncing, therefore there are some defects in judicial practice. In consideration of above problems, the Supreme People’s Court, with local people's court at different levels, has undertook a series of reform measures to change the current situation. In recent years, the judicial reform of China is under way, which aims to perfect the management system of judicial staff, the judicial responsibility system and improve the professional guarantee of judicial officials and, finally, modify the administration mode of personnel, money and material of courts. All above reform measures are designed to guarantee judicial independence, among which, the management of judges has directly pushed forward the establishment of independent status of judges. Nowadays, some courts are beginning their reform of establishing a more effective trial, among which a very important reform measure is to pursue judgments pronounced in court. Therefore, in the current judicial environment, to perfect the system of sentencing judgments in court is feasible and meaningful, thus the relevant research is worth getting more focus from both academic circle and practice field. Keywords: pronouncing judgments in court, civil litigation, judicial reform, pretrial procedure, public trial, principle of concentrating hearing.
Authors and Affiliations
Dun Xuemei
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP380679
- DOI -
- Views 83
- Downloads 0
A synthesis of Review of Literature on Financial Literacy Among the College Students
Abstract: The ability to manage personal finances has become increasingly important in today's globalized world. Finances are an important part of everyday life and financial literacy is the best way to prevent over-inde...
The Status of the Arabic Language in the Lyrics of Hafez
Persian poets mostly when influenced by other language, they wrote their ideas in the style of that language. In that era the intellectual language was Arabic, then the poets accustom with Arabic poem’s rhyme and meters,...
Heathcliff, the 19th century Othello
Abstract: Psychoanalysis studies people’s feelings and characteristics during childhood to discover their problems and solutions. Sigmund Freud is a pioneer in psychoanalysis who believes every single action of human roo...
The Green Structure in Moundou: Between Old Design and Current Expectations
As everywhere in Africa, urbanization of certain regions by colonists respected in the slightest degree the urban standards. They planned green space for a green urban living, and relaxation and to embelish the city. Fro...
Motivation of human resources in Greater Bushenyi Districts Local Governments
This research article correlates the effect of motivation of human resources on synergy of Greater Bushenyi Districts Local Government (GBDLG). Employing descriptive research design, a structured questionnaire and an int...