Who Benefits from Consociationalism? Religious Disparities in Lebanon’s Political System

Journal Title: Religions - Year 2018, Vol 9, Issue 2

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which confessional identities in Lebanon are responsible for shaping individual views toward their government. Specifically, I investigate disparities between religious groups in their perceptions of democracy and democratic principles as applied in Lebanon. Using nationally representative data from the Arab Barometer’s survey of Lebanon, I find that when compared to Maronite Catholics, Druze, and Sunni Muslims, Shia Muslims consistently give higher evaluations of the democratic condition of Lebanon. When compared to members of other religious groups, Shia Muslims are also more trusting of government institutions and perceive Lebanon to be freer. I find little evidence that the application of consociational theory equally and proportionally represents the political needs of the religious groups intended to be served. Rather, my findings reveal religious disparities in evaluations of democracy and political institutions in Lebanon, supporting critics of consociationalism who argue that consociationalism essentializes group-identity to political disputes.

Authors and Affiliations

Kenneth Vaughan

Keywords

Related Articles

The New Internationalists: World Vision and the Revival of American Evangelical Humanitarianism, 1950–2010

International relief and development agencies consistently rank among the largest evangelical organizations, and in recent decades, they have gained increased exposure and influence within the greater humanitarian comm...

Prophesying Women and Ruling Men: Women’s Religious Authority in North American Pentecostalism

The issue of religious authority is one of the main reasons why women have been allowed to participate in Pentecostal churches, and why they have been limited. Women are granted access to ministering authority, but not...

Comparison as Conversation and Craft

This essay argues that comparison as a method of study within religious studies is best thought of in two terms: conversation and craft. As a conversation, comparison has its own history, which has included several maj...

Work as a Value in the Writings of Rabbi Y.Y. Reines

Religious texts in the Jewish tradition uphold a notion of work as an existential need. It follows that work is of no religious significance in itself. Torah study has traditionally put it at the top of the hierarchy o...

Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Religions in 2013

The editors of Religions would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2013: Ahmad, Attiya Aksan, Virginia Altamirano, Teofilo Anbar, Ran Baker, Kelly Bakht,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP25919
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9020051
  • Views 364
  • Downloads 10

How To Cite

Kenneth Vaughan (2018). Who Benefits from Consociationalism? Religious Disparities in Lebanon’s Political System. Religions, 9(2), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-25919