Within the Relation Evidence-Huqm the Distinction Between Makrooh Tahrîmen and Makrooh Tenzîhen in Hanafî Sect
Journal Title: Marife Dini Araştırmalar Dergisi - Year 2018, Vol 18, Issue 1
Abstract
The notion makrooh, considered as part of the provisions of responsibility, appears to be an important phenomenon because of its close relation to the notion haraam and its historical use in a way to refer to different meanings and connotations during the process of its evolution. The notion makrooh, used in the earlier scholarly works in an effort to make reference to the haraam and to imply that it is not proper to commit actions which may potentially fall into the category of haraam, was in later periods incorporated in the scope of provisions of responsibility in connection with the systematization of the notion huqm; subsequent to this process of incorporation, the notion makrooh was defined by the majority of the Islamic scholars as something whose commission does not render thawab and whose avoidance does not entail ithm. Unlike this general view, the Hanafi sect has classified the notion of makrooh as tenzîhen and tahrîmen in a way to become consistent with the distinction between farida and wajeeb. Therefore it’s regarded necessary to analyze the notion makrooh in Hanafî sect. Even though this distinction is evidently noticeable in the usul and furu’ works by the scholars of later period, the study finds that the distinction has been systemized in accordance with the general characteristics of the sect and depending on the relation between huqm and evidence, is related that is related to the Hanafi sect’s evidence approach. From this point of view, it could be said that in Hanafi sect, the makrooh tenzihi corresponds to mandoob whereas makrooh tahrimi to wajeeb or the sunnah considered as strong as wajeeb. However, in the tenzîhen-tahrîmen makrooh distinction made with reference to the Qat’i-Zanni evidence, detection of what constitutes the Zanni and the Qat’i is particularly important for the sake of proper inferences on the final provision. For this reason, in the assessment of the distinction between makrooh tahrîmen and makrooh tenzîhen, it is necessary to consider the evidence, support base for the final provision, it is also necessary to take account of the explanations and justifications in Hanafi fiqh literature regarding the issue that the judgment is related to.
Authors and Affiliations
Selma Çakmak
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP601701
- DOI 10.33420/marife.338043
- Views 248
- Downloads 0
Mevlâna’nın Eserlerinde Esmâ-i Hüsnâ
İslamî kültürde Esmâ-i Hüsnâ’nın yani Allâhü Teâlâ’nın güzel isimlerinin, onu anlamada, tanımada ve tanımlamada çok önemli bir yeri vardır. Müminler yaratıcılarına bu isim ve sıfatlar çerçevesinde inanırlar, onu bu isiml...
Yahudilikte Sadaka
Yoksulluk; insanlık tarihi boyunca en yaygın sosyal problemlerden biridir. Bu yüzden dinlerin büyük çoğunluğu bu sorunu çözmeyi amaçlamış ve yoksulluğun ortadan kaldırılması veya en azından azaltılması yönünde benzer çöz...
Memlükler’in İkinci Döneminde Dımaşk Şehri (784/1382–922/1516)
Buhârî’nin İlmî Şahsiyeti ve Cerh-Ta‘dîl İlmindeki Yeri
Hicrî üçüncü asırda yaşayıp el-Câmi‘u’s-Sahîh adlı eseriyle hadis tarihine ismini yazdıran İmâm Buhârî, diğer taraftan da et-Târîhu’l-Kebîr, et-Târîhu’l-Evsat ve ed-Duafâu’s-Sagîr adlı eserleriyle de ricâl ve cerh-ta‘dîl...
A Qualitative Research on the Source of the Perception of Privacy in Adults
This study aims to reveal the source of the perception of privacy in adults. The phenomenological research design of the qualitative research methodology was applied and the interviews were conducted with 12 adults selec...