Wpływ przyjęcia spadku z dobrodziejstwem inwentarza na przebieg egzekucji sądowej
Journal Title: Białostockie Studia Prawnicze - Year 2017, Vol 0, Issue 22
Abstract
In the case of acceptance of the inheritance bearing the benefi t of inventory, an heir shall be liable for inherited debts only up to the value of the assets of the estate as established in the list of the inventory or the inventory. According to Article 319 of the Polish Civil Procedure Code, if a defendant is liable under specifi c assets or up to the value of such assets, the court may, without specifying the assets or value thereof, uphold an action and allow the defendant to rely on his limited liability in enforcement proceedings. Th e problem of limited liability of heirs who have accepted the inheritance with the favour of the inventory becomes current especially in the situation of the changed legal status introducing as the principle of inheritance with the favour of the inventory. Th e article draws attention to the meaning of such acceptance of the inheritance on the course of enforcement proceeding. It searches for a model of how to implement this law. Th ere are two variants which may be formed as a restriction acting under the enforcement title and taken into account ex offi cio or, as a consequence of an enforceable title, but taken into account on the request or the claim of a debtor exercising that right. According to Article 837 of the Code, a debtor may refer to limited liability, if such limitation is stipulated in an enforcement title. Th e creditor is not obliged to show the amount that is enforceable by the enforceable limitation, but the debtor should demonstrate the grounds and scope of limited liability. Th e conclusions include the assessment of such legal status. Th e second problem raised in the article related to the limited liability of the heirs is the cost of inventory and the possibility of taking it from the inheritance. Th e analysis of the legislation indicates that the decision on what constituents of the estate may take place can only be made by a court and not by a bailiff .
Authors and Affiliations
Paweł Dzienis
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP342005
- DOI 10.15290/bsp.2017.22.04.05
- Views 208
- Downloads 0
Th e Right to Demand to Withhold Information as an Expression of Patient’s Autonomy
Th e right to demand to withhold information is an expression of respect towards patient’s will and his autonomy as well as denial of the paternalistic conception of a relation between an ill individual and his doctor. I...
Well Begun is Half Done: Amendments to the Polish Legal Framework for Consensual Dispute Resolution Needed Aft er Antitrust Damages Directive (2014/104/EU)
Th is article concentrates on amendments to the Polish legal framework for consensual dispute resolution that are needed aft er Antitrust Damages Directive (2014/104/EU). It starts with the general context of changes in...
Industrial Democracy and Involvement of Employees in the Societas Europaea
Industrial democracy denotes a specifi c proposition as well as the practice of shaping relations between employees and employers in an enterprise. Th e intensifi cation of discussion on industrial democracy has happened...
Th e Electoral System, Active Electoral Rights and the Role of the Electorate in the Islamic Republic of Iran
Th is study examines the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its electoral system and the active voting rights of Iranian citizens. Th e article illustrates the dichotomy between constitution and reality in whi...
Evolution of the Models of Disciplinary Procedures in the Light of the Conventional and Constitutional Standards of the Right to a Trial
Th e article focuses on the evolution of one of the most vital elements of disciplinary proceedings, i.e. judicial control (audit) of disciplinary decisions. Regarding this issue, the article discusses jurisprudence of t...