ЗАКОНОДАВЧА ТЕХНІКА ТА ЮРИДИЧНА ТЕРМІНОЛОГІЯ АКТА АУГСБУРЗЬКОГО РАЙХСТАГУ 1555 РОКУ: ДОСВІД ПОПЕРЕДНІХ ІМПЕРСЬКИХ АКТІВ ТА НОВІ ДОСЯГНЕННЯ

Abstract

The article analyses subjects, objects and the content of the legal norms of the Peace Treaty of Augsburg 1555 in the context of using the legislative technique and legal models of the previous imperial freedom of faith acts. Legal interpretation of the texts of the Treaty articles and the causes of its definite formulae is proposed. “The Augsburg whole-empire final decision” of 1555 in the majority of composing legal-norms, legislative technique and legal terminology has been significantly influenced by the previous whole-empire freedom of faith acts of Reichstags and emperor authorities. The majorities of its legal norms final wording are the result of the period of competition and compromises between Catholic and Lutheran parties. But this act has not finished their struggle and has not given them equality of rights. The quintessence of this act’s legal achievements was the accent on peaceful decisions of the Empire’s confessional problems, the specific interpretation of the Freedom of Faith phenomena, narrow range of its subjects and final legitimizing of the Lutheranism as “a religion”. Despite of the declaration of equity of both confessions, the profound interpretation of the contexts and the consequences of the text indicates the privileged status of the Catholicism, which has remained the state religion. Namely, these covert privileges have resulted in ousting not only the Calvinists, who were not the subjects of the act, but also the Lutherans, who had been protected by the act, from the great number of the Empire’s lands. The mentioned legal norms played significant role in further federalization of the Empire and evading its split, but in the long run perspective they have laid grounds for confederalization of the Holy Roman Empire, Thirty Years’ War and the final collapse of the Empire. Therefore, it would have been an exaggeration to view this act upon as the final decision of the territorial religious conflict in German lands and as the guarantor of the modern freedom of faith understanding (even for limited scope).

Authors and Affiliations

Ю. В. Цвєткова

Keywords

Related Articles

ДОСВІД КРАЇН ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОГО СОЮЗУ ЩОДО ЕКОНОМІКО-ПРАВОВОГО СТИМУЛЮВАННЯ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ АЛЬТЕРНАТИВНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ ЕНЕРГІЇ

The necessity to reduce dependence of the European economy on the import of fuel and energy raw materials, as well as the negative impact of their use on the environment, prompt countries of the European Union to increas...

ГЕНЕЗИС ОРГАНІЗОВАНОЇ ЗЛОЧИННОСТІ ТА ПРОТИДІЇ ЇЙ В УКРАЇНІ

In the scientific article discusses the origin and growth of organized crime in Ukraine, as well as taking administrative and legal measures for combating it. Definitely a danger of organized crime at the present stage o...

ГОЛОВНІ ПРАВИЛА ПЕРЕГОВОРІВ ПІД ЧАС МАСОВИХ ЗАВОРУШЕНЬ ІЗ КОНФЛІКТНИМИ ОСОБАМИ ПЕВНОЇ ФОРМИ ПОВЕДІНКИ

The author in this article described tactical-psychological peculiarities of negotiations by the police officers of the preventive communication Group of preventive activity Department of Chief department of National pol...

ДЕЯКІ ПИТАННЯ ВИЗНАЧЕННЯ ОБ’ЄКТІВ ПОДАТКУ НА НЕРУХОМЕ МАЙНО, ВІДМІННЕ ВІД ЗЕМЕЛЬНОЇ ДІЛЯНКИ, В УКРАЇНІ

The transformation of the current legislative framework in taxation area is related to European integration processes of Ukraine which leads to increasing interest in the latest legislative changes in the context of loca...

ШЛЯХИ ВДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ СИСТЕМИ АНТИКОРУПЦІЙНИХ ЗАХОДІВ У КАЗАХСТАНІ: ДОСВІД ДЛЯ УКРАЇНИ

The article analyzed Kazakhstan’s progressive experience in developing anticorruption policy, improving existing legislation, and implementing key stages of reform. The author analyzes the Law of Kazakhstan “On Preventio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP607947
  • DOI -
  • Views 77
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ю. В. Цвєткова (2018). ЗАКОНОДАВЧА ТЕХНІКА ТА ЮРИДИЧНА ТЕРМІНОЛОГІЯ АКТА АУГСБУРЗЬКОГО РАЙХСТАГУ 1555 РОКУ: ДОСВІД ПОПЕРЕДНІХ ІМПЕРСЬКИХ АКТІВ ТА НОВІ ДОСЯГНЕННЯ. Південноукраїнський правничий часопис, 3(), 143-146. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-607947