Abu al-Barakat al-Baghdadi and His Use of Ibn Sina‘s al-Hikma al-‘Arudiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitab al-Mu‘tabar

Abstract

The last four sections of the first book of Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī’s summa, entitled Kitāb al-Mu‘tabar, deal with dialectics, sophistical refutations, rhetoric, and poetics in full line with Aristotle’s Organon. However, they are not so much based on Aristotle’s works, but on a work of the young Ibn Sīnā, namely al-Hikma al-‘Arūdiyya. Both texts have much in common not only in their structure, but also in their very wording. The article presents a basic survey of the correspondences for all four sections and also highlights the most significant differences. However, important part of these differences has a counterpart in an (incomplete) logical text, which is present in the manuscript Nuruosmaniye 4894 and which is, in turn, very close to, albeit not identical, with Ibn Sīnā’s al-Hikma al-‘Arūdiyya as conserved in the unique manuscript Uppsala 364. Therefore, it is obvious that Abū al-Barakāt takes over many formulations and, at once, many ideas from Ibn Sīnā. However, he adds clearly personal elements that often seem to have been religiously inspired and, on occasion, consciously returns to Aristotle’s wording.

Authors and Affiliations

Jules Janssen

Keywords

Related Articles

Intellecting the Intellected: An Examination on the Interpretation of “the Second Intelligibles” in Islamic Tradition of Logic and its Reception during the Ottoman Period

The interpretation of the “second intelligibles” (al-ma‘qūlāt al-thāniya/al-ma‘qūlāt al-thawānī), as a term which is highly sophisticated and closely related to many philosophical disciplines, began with al-Fārābī and co...

Mental Existence Debates in the Post-Classical Period: A Study in the Context of the Essence and Category of Knowledge

The debates on the idea of mental existence is one of the issues in which the tension between the basic principles of Avicennian ontology and his epistemology is most evident. The question of mental existence, which deve...

Quests for a General Method to Solve the Equations of High Degree in the History of Islamic Mathematics: The Case of Irshad al-tullab ila ‘ilm al-hisab

This article introduces a book titled Irshād al-tullāb ilā ‘ilm al-hisāb, written by an anonymous author who most probably lived in Ottoman lands, presented the book to Ottoman Sultan Bayezid II. In the epilogue of the b...

The Problem of Periodization in Sufi Studies: The Struggle of Sufism to Become a Discipline Between the Religious Sciences and Metaphysics

The periodization of sciences is one of the essential devices of treating a field by specification and tracing the transformations in that field. Nonetheless, it would be hard to speak of robust periodization concerning...

Fakhr al-Dīn al Rāzī in the Age of the Transformation of Islamic Thought, Ömer Türker - Osman Demir

Ömer Türker, Osman Demir (ed.), Fakhr al-Dīn al Rāzī in the Age of the Transformation of Islamic Thought [İslâm Düşüncesinin Dönüşüm Çağında Fahreddin er-Rāzī], İstanbul: İSAM Yayınları, 2013, 635 pages, ISBN: 978-605-48...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP296299
  • DOI 10.12658/Nazariyat.3.1.M0035
  • Views 167
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jules Janssen (2016). Abu al-Barakat al-Baghdadi and His Use of Ibn Sina‘s al-Hikma al-‘Arudiyya (or another work closely related to it) in the Logical Part of His Kitab al-Mu‘tabar. Nazariyat İslam Felsefe ve Bilim Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 1-22. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-296299