Admissibility of the most favoured clauses (MFNs) on booking platforms in competition law
Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2016, Vol 8, Issue 4
Abstract
MFN clauses are often applied on platform markets, through which the seller is obliged to offer its products on a platform under the best conditions. From the competition law perspective these clauses are controversial. In the past, courts have classified such clauses as restrictive vertical agreements which abused dominant position on the relevant market. Based on such decisions, the following articlehighlights the competitive economic impact as well as the competitive admissibility of these clauses.<br/><br/>
Authors and Affiliations
Rstislav Funta
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP210517
- DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.129
- Views 142
- Downloads 0
Implementation of Private Law Institutions into Public Law on the Example of Mediation in the Code of Administrative Procedure – Remedy or Placebo?
This article is an attempt to critically evaluate the implementation of the Polish Code of Conduct for the Administration of Mediation Institutions. The author considers the legitimacy of the use of private-law instituti...
Liability for critical infrastructure protection – selected issues
The article is focused on critical infrastructure protection in the field of selected liability issues. Critical infrastructure is significant from the country’s integrity and continuity point of view at all levels: econ...
Twórcza interpretacja lex Rhodia de iactu w doktrynie prawnej ius commune
Wśród recypowanych instytucji prawa rzymskiego, których historyczna ewolucja w ramach ius commune jest wyjątkowo interesująca, wskazać należy zagadnienia związane ze sposobem rozdziału szkód powstałych na skutek wyrzucen...
The Immigration Crisis: a Stress Test of the European legal Culture
Mass migrations entail cultural changes in host nations. These also include the legal culture. Ours is the culture founded on the idea of equality and respect for individual rights, most profoundly expressed during the G...
[b]Refusal to Deal as an Abuse of Dominant Position[/b]
As a rule companies are free to decide where and when they will sell their products and with which companies or clients they are prepared to contract. Such freedom is not unlimited and a dominant company which refuses to...