[b]Refusal to Deal as an Abuse of Dominant Position[/b]

Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2013, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

As a rule companies are free to decide where and when they will sell their products and with which companies or clients they are prepared to contract. Such freedom is not unlimited and a dominant company which refuses to deal may be accused of abusing its dominant position. The aim of the article is to analyse the most common forms of refusals to deal, with regard to the law on competition. The article will focus on practices which lead to the elimination of competition, discrimination against consumers and business partners and creating barriers of entry to the market. Examining such practices will answer the question as to which practices constitute a refusal to deal and abuse a dominant position. The last part of the article will focus on the issue of unbiased justification of refusal to deal. It will examine those conditions where the dominant undertaking can refuse to deal with its competitors or clients because of unbiased reasons.

Authors and Affiliations

Aleksander Maziarz

Keywords

Related Articles

Kartel typu hub-and-spoke – ukryta zmowa horyzontalna?

Zwiększona skuteczność w zakresie egzekwowania prawa konkurencji przyczyniła się do pojawienia się nietypowego rodzaju kartelu, który angażuje nie tylko konkurentów, lecz również ich wspólnego dostawcę (lub detalistę). T...

[b][i]On the Mortality of Leviathan. Private Law Enforcement in the Modern Libertarian Doctrine[/i][/b]

The author presents a libertarian alternative for state police and law enforcement. The theoretical construction based on non-aggression axiom and the primacy of individual freedom offers the vision of spontaneous order...

[i][b]Ownership and Use of Land in Ukraine[/b][/i]

The author presents the legal situation in the area of property relations in the Ukraine. He successively presents: the property law for land property; the purchase of land by citizens of the Ukraine and Ukrainian legal...

Immediacy principle in the Roman criminal procedure

In analysing the historical development of the Roman criminal procedure it should be observed that it followed the immediacy principle from the earliest times until the Justinian period. Adherence to this rule is best co...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP62449
  • DOI -
  • Views 85
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Aleksander Maziarz (2013). [b]Refusal to Deal as an Abuse of Dominant Position[/b]. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 5(1), 563-585. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-62449