ALIVE BODY, DEAD BODY AND HALF-ALIVE BODY: CULTURAL SUBSTITUTION AND CONSTRUCTION OF GENDER

Abstract

Trash has an indicative complex of features: accentuated incompliance with the Great Narrative, declared refusal from the hegemony of technical device, simplification of language, demonstrative aesthetic downplay, technical helplessness, which is labeled as deliberateness and «naïve writing», claims for «iconic text» etc. If one reflects upon this list, it becomes more or less obvious, that trash does for us our own social and cultural work, which we should be doing but aren’t. It substantiates the ambivalence of our attitude towards ostentatious vulgarity and captures the pleasure that is linked to it. Trash, as an original act of culture production (evenof culture policy) is not a simplification per se, but also а substitution. It is important to define one of the accompanying effects of this type of cultural substitution: trash achieves incompatible success in direct production of sensual. The construction of gender in trash is based, first of all, on the work with two so-called last taboos of the civilization – pedophilia and cannibalism. What seems at the first glance as throwing away of moral logic in noa, in regard to pedophilia and cannibalism, in trash visualises the desire to categorize the Other, classify it – and at that is created the illusion of seduction. In case of trash, we speak of the actualization of Foucault’s observation on the disciplinary practices of the body, which becomes the place for creating corresponding discourses. This thought in the processes of cultural substitution is driven to the «necessary» (appropriate for the perception) grotesque. Mostly, trash presents utopian projects, which allow imagining identity from which the gender component can be extracted. Remarkably, that in such procedures it is possible to imagine sex. The «I magined» sex relates to the obvious differences, as in noa it is always about the representation of abnormal body (eroticized, modified, sick, half-dead, etc.), according to which are elaborated the certain conventions in the description of normal body. Conventions are actualized also in regard to the borders of fictionconditionality, thus become visible also the strict «formulae» of genre prose.

Authors and Affiliations

G. Uliura

Keywords

Related Articles

VISUAL SYMBOLS IN MAIDAN POETRY

The article deals with the images and symbols of the Dignity Revolution poetry. The author traces the role of visual thinking in the folk traditions. The Dignity Revolution poetry has not been investigated yet, therefore...

THE TEXTUALITY OF THE WORLD IN YULIYA STAKHIVSKA’S POETRY

The article is focused on the poetic aspect of «Verde» poem collection by Yuliya Stakhivska. In particular, the concepts of vegetation, corporality, landscape, place, and memory in Stakhivska’s poetry are analyzed. The s...

«THE GLYPHS OF LOVE, ENCODED THROUGH THE BOOK OF CHANGES»: THE POETICS OF BODY ENOUNCIATING IN LESYA MUDRAK’S COLLECTION «TEXT-TYLE’& LIBIDO (REFLECTIONS)»

In the article the specific nature of corporal correlation has been studied in different aspects: time and space, intimate and existential, ironic and grotesque. The study was based on the material of a new collection of...

FANTASY AS A MEANS OF INNER EMIGRATION IN THE WRITING OF HOPE MIRRLEES

The article deals with the life and writing of the British writer Hope Mirrlees, as well as the reasons and specifics of her inner emigration. Mirrlees‟s writing has only recently gained literary scholars‟ attention but...

JOURNEY AS A UNIVERSAL METAPHOR OF BEING IN OLEH SHYNKARENKO’S NOVELS

The main object of the article is the use of the universal metaphor of journey as the author's strategy for constructing a character‟s identity and for an absurd text creation. The aims of this study are the identificati...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP233189
  • DOI -
  • Views 165
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

G. Uliura (2016). ALIVE BODY, DEAD BODY AND HALF-ALIVE BODY: CULTURAL SUBSTITUTION AND CONSTRUCTION OF GENDER. Наукові праці. Серія "Філологія. Літературознавство", 271(259), 116-121. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-233189