Immediacy principle in the Roman criminal procedure

Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2016, Vol 8, Issue 2

Abstract

In analysing the historical development of the Roman criminal procedure it should be observed that it followed the immediacy principle from the earliest times until the Justinian period. Adherence to this rule is best confirmed by the manner in which particular evidence was taken in the Roman criminal procedure, as well as by its judicial evaluation. The significance attached by Romans to the principle in question is corroborated primarily by an example of evidence obtained from a witness’s testimony. Already in the Republic period, testimony given personally by a witness before the court was preferred to testimony in the form of a document. Adherence to the immediacy principle in the Roman criminal procedure was manifested by the fact of preparing reports, initially comprising only certain decisions, e.g. judgements, and later all procedural actions. In the Empire period, the Roman criminal procedure was also dominated by the immediacy principle. The fact that the principle was adhered to is explicitly confirmed by the rescripts issued by Emperor Hadrian, expressing the demand that direct evidence be taken before the court, the reform of the irenarchae’s office implemented by Antoninus Pius, as well as a ban on legal assistance in criminal cases, confirmed by Justinian. Certain exceptions to the immediacy principle were allowed, such as submitting at a trial written laudationes prepared out of court and reports on interrogation of witnesses compiled during the proceedings, as well as admissibility of circumstantial evidence.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Chmiel

Keywords

Related Articles

Umowa koncesyjna – na pograniczu prawa prywatnego i publicznego

W polskiej doktrynie pojęcie koncesji jest najczęściej utożsamiane z decyzją administracyjną, co wynika z ustawy z dnia 2 lipca 2004 r. o swobodzie działalności gospodarczej2. Koncesja, w tym znaczeniu, jest formą prawną...

The experience of the Duchy of Warsaw in the field of legal education

The article deals with legal education in the Duchy of Warsaw (1807–1815), which was a transitory period between a feudal and modern state. The urgent need for institutional education of a state personnel resulted from e...

[b][i]Identyfikacja pomocy publicznej w projektach partnerstwa publiczno-prywatnego[/i][/b]

Publikacja poświecona została problematyce identyfikacji pomocy publicznej w projektach partnerstwa publiczno-prywatnego. W dobie ogólnoświatowego kryzysu finansowego formuła partnerstwa publiczno-prywatnego może okazać...

[b][i]The Restitution of Private Property. The Reprivatisation of Central and Eastern Europe[/i][/b]

This article concerns a problem that generally not much attention is given to, namely the restitution of property confiscated by communistic regimes in Central and Eastern Europe. After the fall of communism, new democra...

[b]Pozorność zbliżenia warunków konkurencji i dostępu do rynku funduszy inwestycyjnych w związku z implementacją Dyrektywy UCITS IV w Polsce[/b]

Artykuł ma na celu przedstawienie wytycznych zawartych w Dyrektywie UCITS IV w zakresie ujednolicania krajowych porządków prawnych celem zbliżenia warunków konkurencji między przedsiębiorstwami zbiorowego inwestowania or...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP210537
  • DOI 10.7206/kp.2080-1084.106
  • Views 48
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andrzej Chmiel (2016). Immediacy principle in the Roman criminal procedure. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 8(2), 2-16. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-210537