Comparison Of Forced Air and Conductive Heating Systems During Out-Patient Orthopaedic Surgeries - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal Title: Journal of Anesthesia and Surgery - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: It is critical to maintain a normal or near-normal body temperature during and after surgery. Traditionally this has been done using a forced air device. One of the main concerns with forced air devices is that they may increase bacterial contamination in the surgical field before and during surgery. Recently, conductive heating systems have been developed and used to address these concerns. While these devices do not disrupt airflow at the surgical site, their efficacy versus forced air devices has been called into question. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a forced air device to a conductive heating device in their ability to maintain perioperative patient normothermia. Methods: 50 patients undergoing outpatient orthopedic procedures were randomized into either the Forced Air group (FA) or Conductive Heat group (CH). In the patients randomized to the FA group, a Bair Hugger™ (Arizant Medical, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minnesota) forced-air cover was positioned over the upper body (if lower extremity surgery) or lower body (if upper extremity surgery). In patients assigned to the CH group, a VitaHEAT Medical® (VitaHEAT Medical, LLC , Rolling Meadows, IL) conductive heating device was placed under the torso of the patient. Following standard surgical protocol, patients in both groups were draped appropriately. Stabilization of the ambient temperature was maintained near 20°C. Data regarding demographics and anthropometrics wsa recorded. Patient temperature was recorded at 15 minute intervals throughout the surgery and throughout the recovery room stay. Intraoperative and recovery room temperatures between the two groups were compared using a student’s T-test. Results: No statistically significant difference in mean intra-operative temperatures was found between the two groups (FA = 97.95 °F / 36.64 °C and CH = 97.64 °F / 36.47 °C, p = .063). No statistically significant difference in mean recovery room temperatures was found between the two groups (FA = 97.68 °F / 36.49°C and CH = 97.53 °F / 36.41°C, p = .39) Conclusion: There was no difference between intra-operative and recovery room temperatures between patients using either a forced air device or a conductive heating device. Those involved in perioperative care should be familiar with conductive heating devices as a potential alternative to traditional forced air devices. Clinical Relevance: Conductive heating devices may cause less contamination at the surgical site than forced air devices. However, the efficacy of conductive heating devices is largely unknown. This study demonstrates that conductive heating devices are as efficacious as forced air devices.

Authors and Affiliations

Vishal Mehta

Keywords

Related Articles

How Music Reduces Anxiety and Amount of Sedatives used in Patients during Surgery

Aim: This literature review provides an overview of published data with regards to the inclusion of music in surgery, and its effects on: (i) The dosage of anaesthesia or sedation and (ii) Stress and anxiety levels. Meth...

Mitochondrial Myopathy In Old Age: A Case Report

Mitochondria are intracellular organelle involved in ATP production present in all cells except erythrocytes. Historically mitochondrial diseases were considered to be neuromuscular disease. Mitochondrial disease, once t...

A Selective Anterior Obturator Nerve Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty

An 83 year-old male with history of hypertension, complete heart block with a pacemaker, ankylosing spondylitis, prostate cancer, obesity and obstructive sleep apnea was scheduled for a right total hip arthroplasty (THA)...

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) Survey about Hydration in Pediatric Anesthesia Patients; Findings from a University Teaching Hospital

Perioperative fluid management has changed considerably in the last few years in light of new evidence based medicine. In our institute unfortunately there is no guideline at the time of this study, which would mandate i...

Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review of the Current Evidence

The positive impact of regional anesthesia on surgical outcome has continued to evolve In recent years the focus of acute pain management strategies following total knee arthroplasty has shifted from femoral nerve bloc...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP418931
  • DOI 10.15436/2377-1364.18.1771
  • Views 91
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Vishal Mehta (2018). Comparison Of Forced Air and Conductive Heating Systems During Out-Patient Orthopaedic Surgeries - A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Anesthesia and Surgery, 5(1), 13-16. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-418931