Does MIDH Inhibitors is a Promising Therapy?

Abstract

IDH are key metabolic enzymes that play a role in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, glutamine metabolism, lipogenesis, glucose sensing, and regulation of cellular redox status. Mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 proteins catalyze the reduction of α-KG to 2-HG. The abnormal production of the oncometabolite 2-HG promote tumorigenesis. Depending on the associated genomic aberrations and the cellular context, the oncogenic potential of IDH1/2 mutations ranges from an initiating event - promoting transformation - to a secondary oncogenic event conferring selective advantage to cancer cells. IDH are family of enzymes that comprises three proteins, IDH1, IDH2 and IDH3. IDH1 is located in the cytoplasm while IDH2 and IDH3 are located in the mitochondria [1,2]. The IDHs are tricycle carboxylic acid cycle enzymes which convert isocitrate to α-KG via oxidative decarboxylation, producing NADPH (IDH1 and 2) and NADH (IDH3) [3]. IDH proteins are involved in diverse cellular processes including adaptation to hypoxia, histone demethylation and DNA modification [4]. Mutations have only been identified in IDH1 and IDH2 gene [3]. The mutated IDH1 and IDH2 proteins have a gain of function, neomorphic activity, catalyzing the reduction of α-KG to 2-HG [5]. The abnormal production of the oncometabolite 2-HG promote tumorigenesis [5]. IDH1/2 mutations define distinct subsets of cancers, including low-grade gliomas, secondary glioblastomas, chondrosarcomas, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, and hematologic malignancies [6]. MIDH1/2 is among the most common mutations in AML. IDH1 mutations are less common than IDH2 mutations in AML [7]. Mutations in genes encoding IDH1 and IDH2 gene isoforms occur in 6-16% and 8-19% of AML cases, respectively [3] (~20% of patients have combined mutation) [7]. The frequency of mutations in these genes increases with age at diagnosis [3]. mIDH are less frequent in MDS (~5%) and myeloproliferative neoplasms. The frequency increases to ~ 20% in myeloproliferative neoplasm at leukemic transformation [7]. In myeloid malignancies, IDH1 mutations most often involve a cysteine (R132C) or histidine (R132H) substitution for arginine at R132. In IDH2 mutations, arginine is most often replaced by glutamine at residue 140 (R140Q) and by lysine at residue 172 (R172K). IDH2-R140 mutations are more common than IDH2-R172 mutations, representing ~ 80% of IDH2 mutations in AML. IDH2-R172 mutations may be more frequent in older patients. Less frequently, other amino-acid substitutions are involved (for example, IDH2-R172W) [7]. These mutations must occur in a heterozygous form to be able to generate mutant heterodimers. The wild-type enzyme produces α-KG, and the mutant subunit monomer swiftly reduces α-KG to its functional antagonist, 2-HG [3]. mIDH1 and mIDH2 have different enzymatic activities. Cytoplasm mIDH1 generates less 2-HG than mitochondrial mIDH2 enzyme. This may be due to differences in amounts of α-KG substrate, which is found in greater abundance in the mitochondrion than in the cytoplasm [7]. 2HG oncometabolite accumulation promotes tumor genesis through inhibition of a cancer-associated transcription factor such as HIF [1]. Moreover, 2-HG is structurally similar to α-KG and competitively inhibits α-KG-dependent enzymes, including [7] histone demethylases and methyl cytosine dioxygenases of the TET family that regulate cellular epigenetic status [8]. TET2 protein is involved in DNA demethylation. Histone demethylases regulate chromatin status, enabling activation or inhibition of gene transcription [7]. This epigenetic dysregulation produces global histone- and DNA hypermethylation [1] characterized by an increased methylation of promoter sites of target genes [4], altered gene expression leading to differentiation arrest of hematopoietic progenitors [7] and a maturation block [3] which potentially lead to leukemogenesis [1]. mIDH may also exist in preleukemic stem cells [7]. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in newly diagnosed AML patients have a strong association with AML-M2 subtype and NPM1 mutation [1]. IDH1 mutation was significantly associated with NPM1 mutation, in 12.5% to 67% as compared to the wild-type IDH1 cases. IDH2 mutations were significantly associated with NPM1 mutations in 60% of the cases [1]. They are almost always mutually exclusive with TET2 mutations and with mutations in the Wilms’ tumor 1 gene [7]. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are enriched in AML with normal cytogenetic (CN-AML), but may be present along with other cytogenetic abnormalities in 30% of the cases [3]. They are associated with cytogenetically intermediate-risk disease, and occur often with trisomy 8 [7]. No significant correlation with other mutations such as FLT3, RAS, and AML1 could be demonstrated [1]. The prognostic impact of IDH1/2 mutations in AML has been conflicting. Early data suggested adverse impact of IDH mutations in AML while recent data suggest that site of mutation (IDH1-R132, IDH2-R140, IDH2-R172) and co-occurrence with other mutations influences outcome. Co-occurrence of IDH2R140 with DNMT3a mutation confers worse prognosis while IDH2R172 mutation, though uncommon, is associated with favorable outcome. While survival is better in IDH1/2-mutated AML with concurrent NPM1 mutations, it compares less favorably against cytogenetically normal AML with NPM1 mutation alone [3]. Evidence was not considered sufficient to definitively categorize aberrations in IDH (1 or 2) into either the intermediate or adverse group, but may be useful in recommending patients for specific therapies [9].

Authors and Affiliations

Nahla A M Hamed

Keywords

Related Articles

Okadaic Acid Induces the Rats� Memory Impairment and Tau Protein Hyperphosphorylation And Intervened by Flavonoids from Stem and Leaf of Scutellaria Baicalensis Georgi

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive cognitive impairment. The neuropathology of AD is represented by widespread deposits of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) formed by phosph...

Contrasting Findings on Melatonin Concerning Inflammation and Glucose Tolerance - Consequences to the Development of Melatonergic Drugs

The pleiotropy of melatonin is a reason for using this hormone or synthetic melatonergic agonists for testing their suitability in various diseases and disorders. However, it is important to remain aware that many precli...

Evolution and Epidemiology of Antimicrobial Resistance: Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus is a potentially pathogenic bacterium that causes a wide range of diseases. These are causing different infections and resistance mechanism due to of its wide virulence factors. The increase in the...

FC for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Despite overall improvements, relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)remains a major cause of morbidity [1]. Treatment option for relapsed/refractory DLBCL is salvage chemotherapy followed by an autolog...

Efficacy of Sorafenib in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Refractory to Transarterial Chemoembolization

Background: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness is an indication for sorafenib treatment in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims at evaluating the ef...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP567200
  • DOI 10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000197
  • Views 201
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nahla A M Hamed (2017). Does MIDH Inhibitors is a Promising Therapy?. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR), 1(2), 373-375. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-567200