Evaluating the quality of training courses: a comparison of different designs for evaluating training

Journal Title: ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies - Year 2009, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper aims to show that some designs for evaluating training are more suitable than others in a quality approach. Effectively, several practices of evaluation are incompatible. These are presented in the first section: Kirkpatrick’s fourlevel training evaluation model (Reaction, Learning, Behavior and Results), Kraiger’s comprehensive model based on learning outcomes, as well as the more recent designs taking into account multiple stakeholder perceptions (Michalski & Cousins). On the basis of these works and of some original practices, we attempt to show the aspects which are the most adapted to a total quality approach.

Authors and Affiliations

Isabelle GILLET| Enseignants-chercheurs, Université de Bourgogne Pôle Apprentissages Acquisitions Formation Education, Dijon, France, SPMS, Daniel GILIBERT*| Enseignants-chercheurs, Université de Bourgogne Pôle Apprentissages Acquisitions Formation Education, Dijon, France, SPMS

Keywords

Related Articles

Experimenting relations between artists and scientists : the appropriation of motion sensors by dancers

We want to show here how recent innovations called Motion Capture, still being tested in laboratory on their potential uses, invite us to change our way to relate to the “technique”. We don’t want to question wha...

Mediated Holocaust memories in Italy from 1945 to present

The present work aims to address the relationship between war memory and media culture, along with present political and social issues. Through an analysis of the Italian development and construction of Holocaust memory...

Social networks practices by TV broadcasters: a new freedom for the viewer and an audience management tool for the broadcaster

This article studies the evolution from digital TV to social TV, being the TV that uses social networks as a mean to communicate with the audience. More precisely, we study the role of social TV as a social catalyst (A...

Research Policy. The case of the Social sciences and the Humanities

Research policy in the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) is difficult to implement because of the very characteristics of these disciplines (no image, no technology, no patent) and because of requisite public int...

Remediation and remembrance: “Dancing Auschwitz” Collective Memory and New Media

A new generation is changing the face of Holocaust remembrance, a morally laden subject that continues to captivate public imagination, spark controversy and generate dialogue, now by using social media. In summer 2010...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP9027
  • DOI -
  • Views 378
  • Downloads 24

How To Cite

Isabelle GILLET, Daniel GILIBERT* (2009). Evaluating the quality of training courses: a comparison of different designs for evaluating training. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies, 2(1), 41-52. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-9027