Journal Article Critique: The Validity and Reliability of Cross-National Surveys Analysis

Journal Title: Business Ethics and Leadership (BEL) - Year 2018, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

The purpose of this review paper is to provide a guideline “on how to review and comment on published scientific paper”. The original article is well-written, based on secondary data. This paper was written about a decade ago, though still very relevant and useful for the students and scholars of social and environmental sciences. This article deals with the validity and reliability of cross-national survey research primarily based on secondary information. The author opens the question about the on-going validity and reliability debate and issues of postmodernism on global environmentalism, pioneered by Steven R. Brechin and Willet Kempton in 1994. Eric Neumayer (2002) has effectively introduced the themes of “Global Environmentalism: A challenge to the Post-Materialism Thesis”, a paper by Brechin and Kempton (1994) which challenged the conventional wisdom that people in developing countries lack environmental values. Brechin and Kempton (1994) rejected the established notion of the western world’s view of developing nations as having little concern for environmental conservation, which was until recently guided by a colonial mentality. The article by Brechin and Kempton advocates in favor of global environmental concern by people of the developing world. They have used the data from Dunlap, Riley E., George H. Gallup, Jr., and Alec M. Gallup (1993a), where they show that people from the developing world are equally concerned about the environmental problems. Neumayer (2002) did not adequately describe the core concept of Brechin and Kempton in examining the validity and reliability of cross-national surveys. In this review, I will first present a snap-shot of the article in term of research design and testing of validity and reliability. And secondly, I will examine to what extent the author has succeeded in bringing to light empirical evidence on cross-national research design (see my final section on the strengths and weaknesses of the article).

Authors and Affiliations

Medani P. Bhandari

Keywords

Related Articles

Deterministic Modeling for Evaluating Consumers’ Attitude towards Telecommunication Service in Bangladesh

This study is conducted empirically for measuring consumers’ attitude towards telecommunication service in Bangladesh. A conceptual model has been developed based on two constructs. Telecommunication service related intr...

Relationship of Corporate Governance and Efficiency of Selected Public and Private Sector Banks in India

The business of banks runs on the public faith and their confidence in banks. The confidence level of the public can only be developed by proper disclosures and transparency. The good corporate governance practices ensur...

Leadership as a driver for organizational change

The paper aims to review the dominating literature and recent findings on leadership phenomenon and its role in organizational change. The studies in the sphere of strategic management, organizational theories and social...

Analysis of the Determinants of Social Capital in Organizations

At the present, Mexico is experiencing a climate of uncertainty and widespread distrust, due to the increase in the level of crime and low level of confidence derived from opportunistic behavior aimed at obtaining an ind...

Scientific and methodical approaches to determining the center-orientation of financial conglomerates with the factor and cluster analysis

Involving Ukraine in the globalization of the world economic and financial system makes the transfer of most of the positive and negative effects of the external world in Ukrainian conditions that will have consequences...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP465598
  • DOI 10.21272/bel.2(1).116-120.2018
  • Views 127
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Medani P. Bhandari (2018). Journal Article Critique: The Validity and Reliability of Cross-National Surveys Analysis. Business Ethics and Leadership (BEL), 2(1), 116-120. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-465598