РАЦІОНАЛЬНА РЕКОНСТРУКЦІЯ ЯК МЕТОД ПРИКЛАДНОЇ СИТУАЦІЙНОЇ ЛОГІКИ
Journal Title: Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Серія: філософія - Year 2016, Vol 1, Issue 779
Abstract
Rational reconstruction as the method of historical and philosophical cognition is in the center of historical and philosophical discussion. Firstly, I. Lacatos paid attention to it, then, especially in the sphere of historical and philosophical researching, it was examined Z. Kamensky and S. Rudenko. However, as the method of applied situational logic, rational reconstruction has not researched. This article has the aim to fill a gap and show the intercommunication between the concept of situational logic by K. Popper and the method of rational reconstruction I. Lacatos, Z. Kamensky and S. Rudenko. His positional logic, K. Popper did not tell in the form of the whole concept. It is introduced by the chain of separate fragments. Consequently necessity its whole reconstruction. So, to understand I. Lacatos’s method of rational reconstruction, should realize rational reconstruction of K. Poppers’s situational logic. So, one explanation will help to realize another explanation. Situational logic or K. Popper’s logic of situations is rational reconstruction and interpretation of local situation. It divided on theoretical and applied situational logic. S. Rudenko’s method of rational reconstruction in modern methodological concept of researching the history of philosophy is added by method of reconstructional reflection. S. Rudenko has proposed reconstructive reflection to realize as the method, witch on the foundation of analysis of ontological, gnoseological and cognitive foundations coordinate conflicting rational reconstructions the history of native philosophy. The function of theoretical situational logic carries out the methodological reflection and interpretation of situation, the function of applied situational logic – its interpretations of Darwinism and Marxism. I. Lacatos’s method of rational reconstruction the history of science in Z. Kamensky’s imperatively-directional researching and S. Rudenko’s modern methodological concepts non-descriptive historical and philosophical Ukrainian Studies had status of methodological instrument by cultural predication historical and philosophical reflection.
Authors and Affiliations
Ярослав Гнатюк
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP297792
- DOI -
- Views 154
- Downloads 0
ПОНЯТТЄВЕ СПРОЩЕННЯ ТА ФІЛОСОФСЬКИЙ СМИСЛ
Атомарне уявлення про утворення смислу речення як функцію простих елементів, представлених окремими логічними поняттями у вигляді самостійних слів, утворює метафізичну передумову аналітичної філософії та основний методол...
INTERRELATIONS OF SYNCHRONIC AND DIACHRONIC ASPECTS IN YURI LOTMAN’S SEMIOTICS
The authors of the article analyze the peculiarities of Yu. Lotman’s semiotics. In the article, it is deducted that his theory of semiosphere was based on the critic examination and development of the system and structur...
ПРОТЕСТАНТСЬКІ ІНТЕНЦІЇ У ТВОРЧОСТІ Г. СКОВОРОДИ
H. Skovoroda's religious and philosophical doctrine has an outstanding aesthetic, intellectual and spiritual value. The Ukrainian thinker offers a special type of philosophy, a philosophy that is not only intellectually...
THE PLACE OF CULTURE IN THE "WAVE MODEL" OF HISTORICAL CHANGES
The article analyzes the concept of the "wave" model of E. Toffler history. The main position of the study is fixation and characterization of the three "waves" of history. With the "third wave", modernity arises, with i...
КОНСТРУКТИВІСТСЬКЕ БАЧЕННЯ ДЕІДЕОЛОГІЗАЦІЇ ПІЗНАННЯ
This article is a rough draft to the project of deideologisation of knowledge made in constructivist techniq ue. Despite of numerous project-like speculations around revision of epistemology and its relation to the proce...