REFERENDARZ SĄDOWY NIE JEST UPRAWNIONY DO ROZPOZNAWANIA SKARG NA CZYNNOŚCI KOMORNIKA (ART. 767 K.P.C.) Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z 26 czerwca 2014 r. III CZP 30/14 (Lex Polonica nr 8532895)

Journal Title: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. Seria Prawnicza - Year 2015, Vol 17, Issue 17

Abstract

The subject of this paper is the analysis of the resolution of the Supreme Court of 26 June 2014, in which the Court stated that the judicial officer is not entitled to hear complaints against the acts of the court executive officer (Article 767 of the Code of Civil Procedure). As ground for its judgment, the Court ruled that none of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure entitle the judicial officer to hear complaints against the acts of the court executive officer and such a power cannot be drawn only from the fact that the Article 7673 is located directly after the Article 767 of the Code. The gloss deepens the Supreme Court deliberations by discussing competences of the judicial officer in the enforcement proceedings and presenting the institution of the complaint against the acts and omissions of the court executive officer. It also presents other arguments confirming the validity of the discussed resolution, indicating the possibility of infringement of the principle of legal equivalence of citizens as well as the lack of capability of the judicial officer to perform control over his own decisions after they were appealed against, which also excludes the possibility of controlling actions of other judicial authorities.

Authors and Affiliations

Aneta Arkuszewska

Keywords

Related Articles

SPRAWOZDANIE Z DRUGIEJ OGÓLNOPOLSKIEJ KONFERENCJI NAUKOWEJ „KONSUMENT NA RYNKU KOLEJOWYCH PRZEWOZÓW PASAŻERSKICH”

On March 18, 2015. the Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz was the sec-ond nationwide conference Fri. “The consumer on the rail passenger market” cluster of experts, graduate students and students for t...

SYSTEM RZĄDÓW RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ W ŚWIETLE KONSTYTUCJI Z 1997 ROKU (PROLEGOMENA)

Since 1989, the problem of the government system, including in particular the government system normatively defined in the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997, has been a subject of vivid interest and...

MODIFIKÁCIE TRESTNÝCH SADZIEB TRESTU ODŇATIA SLOBODY

The author of the article deals with imprisonment as a universal kind of penalty, which may be imposed for each offense. The criminal rates of imprisonment embodied in the Special Part of the Criminal Code may be modifie...

ZASKARŻANIE UCHWAŁ WALNEGO ZGROMADZENIA AKCJONARIUSZY (HAUPTVERSAMMLUNG) NIEMIECKIEJ SPÓŁKI AKCYJNEJ (AKTIENGESSELSCHAFT)

Defective resolution of corporate entities should be nullified. It can, however, be detrimental for the safety of commerce. Under a German law one can distiguish two types of defective resolu-tions: whereas some are void...

ANALIZA ROZWOJU TEORII DOTYCZĄCYCH ROZGRANICZENIA PRAWA PUBLICZNEGO I PRYWATNEGO PRZY ZASTOSOWANIU PARADYGMATU THOMASA S. KUHNA

The presented thesis concerns analysis of theories related to distinguishing between private law and public law due to the T.S. Kuhn paradigms. Throughout the ages, legal scholars have been interested in the duality of p...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP185406
  • DOI -
  • Views 165
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Aneta Arkuszewska (2015). REFERENDARZ SĄDOWY NIE JEST UPRAWNIONY DO ROZPOZNAWANIA SKARG NA CZYNNOŚCI KOMORNIKA (ART. 767 K.P.C.) Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z 26 czerwca 2014 r. III CZP 30/14 (Lex Polonica nr 8532895). Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. Seria Prawnicza, 17(17), 157-165. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-185406