REFERENDARZ SĄDOWY NIE JEST UPRAWNIONY DO ROZPOZNAWANIA SKARG NA CZYNNOŚCI KOMORNIKA (ART. 767 K.P.C.) Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z 26 czerwca 2014 r. III CZP 30/14 (Lex Polonica nr 8532895)

Journal Title: Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. Seria Prawnicza - Year 2015, Vol 17, Issue 17

Abstract

The subject of this paper is the analysis of the resolution of the Supreme Court of 26 June 2014, in which the Court stated that the judicial officer is not entitled to hear complaints against the acts of the court executive officer (Article 767 of the Code of Civil Procedure). As ground for its judgment, the Court ruled that none of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure entitle the judicial officer to hear complaints against the acts of the court executive officer and such a power cannot be drawn only from the fact that the Article 7673 is located directly after the Article 767 of the Code. The gloss deepens the Supreme Court deliberations by discussing competences of the judicial officer in the enforcement proceedings and presenting the institution of the complaint against the acts and omissions of the court executive officer. It also presents other arguments confirming the validity of the discussed resolution, indicating the possibility of infringement of the principle of legal equivalence of citizens as well as the lack of capability of the judicial officer to perform control over his own decisions after they were appealed against, which also excludes the possibility of controlling actions of other judicial authorities.

Authors and Affiliations

Aneta Arkuszewska

Keywords

Related Articles

SPOŁECZNE NIEBEZPIECZEŃSTWO JAKO CECHA FAKTYCZNA KARALNEGO PRZYWŁASZCZENIA AUTORSTWA LUB KARALNEGO WPROWADZENIA W BŁĄD CO DO AUTORSTWA

The social danger constitutes the factual attribute of each crime stipulated and defined by the polish substantive crime law’s legislator. Hereby is also provided protection of those social welfares, which are recognised...

SPRAWOZDANIE Z DRUGIEJ OGÓLNOPOLSKIEJ KONFERENCJI NAUKOWEJ „KONSUMENT NA RYNKU KOLEJOWYCH PRZEWOZÓW PASAŻERSKICH”

On March 18, 2015. the Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz was the sec-ond nationwide conference Fri. “The consumer on the rail passenger market” cluster of experts, graduate students and students for t...

ODWOŁANIA DO PISMA ŚWIĘTEGO W ORZECZENIACH SĄDÓW USA (BIBLICAL REFERENCES IN THE U.S. CASE LAW)

The paper deals with explicit references to Bible in judicial decision-making in the United States. The study of federal and state court opinions reveals the variety of purposes for which judges use biblical passages. An...

ADWOKATURA POLSKA W OKRESIE ROZBIORÓW (UWAGI HISTORYCZNOPRAWNE)

The article presents the history of Polish legal profession in times of partitions in terms of its social work, professional and political as an expression of the struggle for preservation of Polish-ness in the Polish na...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP185406
  • DOI -
  • Views 142
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Aneta Arkuszewska (2015). REFERENDARZ SĄDOWY NIE JEST UPRAWNIONY DO ROZPOZNAWANIA SKARG NA CZYNNOŚCI KOMORNIKA (ART. 767 K.P.C.) Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z 26 czerwca 2014 r. III CZP 30/14 (Lex Polonica nr 8532895). Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. Seria Prawnicza, 17(17), 157-165. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-185406