SOCIAL AND POLITICAL EMPHASIS OF M. KOSTOMAROV’S EPISTOLARY PUBLICISM
Journal Title: Львівський філологічний часопис - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue
Abstract
In the paper, the author points out that, writerly epistolary publicism is one of the most specific elements of national literary process during Romantic period. A real «explosion» of writerly publicism, epistolary in particular, can be traced in Ukrainian literature of this period. A letter allowed the artists to express their objection or agreement in any dispute immediately as well as openly. However, open letters, which could serve as arguments in literary discussions, are virtually non-existent in national writerly epistolary publicism. The developmental character and direction vectors of Ukrainian writerly publicism during Romantic period depended not only on the processes taking place in the national writing of that period, but also on a number of extra-artistic factors influencing its development. Admittedly, in the process of Romanticism formation not all discussions in Ukrainian literature concerned only literature affairs. These discussions always reached outside literature and dealt with the issue of unique Ukrainian language, literature, culture as well as Ukrainian nation and Ukrainian national identity. In this article, the author emphasizes that the epistolary form of romantic publicism simply increased its efficiency since a letter should be read and answered immediately. This led to the emergence of boisterous and long-lasting debates, which were typical for Romantic period in Ukraine. Based on the analysis of Ukrainian romanticist M. Kostomarov’s epistolary publicism extracts, the author proved that social and political issues are predominant in Ukrainian artists’ publicistic statements during Romantic period. In a number of open controversial and resonant letters, which were published in those days periodical press (they are «A letter to the publisher of «Kolokol», «A letter to the editor! Regarding the same issue», «A letter to publishers Livchak and Klimkovich», «A letter to A.D. Gradovsky», «Two Russian folk characters. A letter to the editor»), M.Kostomarov upheld the idea of Ukrainian people’s singularity and independence, their right for self-sufficient development, he also considered the nature and possible prospects of Ukrainian and Polish, Ukrainian and Russian relations. Aforementioned connected his publicistic statements with social and political area, and this was absolutely in compliance with national requirements of that time.
Authors and Affiliations
Оксана Михайлівна Свириденко
Modality rendering difficulties in translation of German information documents into Ukrainian.
The article researches modality rendering peculiarities, analyzes texts of instructions in German and Ukrainian, focuses on regular equivalents and offers possible solutions of translation issues of modality rendering in...
Figurative means of oppositions' RIGHT/LEFT, STRAIGHT/CROOKED expression in the English language: axiologyand typology
In the traditional folk culture language, a term "left" is usually referred to such attributes as weak, wrong, disordered, odd, negative, indirect, fuzzy, illegal, sinful and "right", respectively, being attributed by st...
Particular features of pragmatic strategies and their realization in English didactic discourse
The article deals with pragmatic strategies typical to English didactic discourse. It determines the main linguistic markers intended to realize such strategies in educational texts on economics.
Metaphors and phraseological elements of material culture as a manifestation of householdcentrism (on the basis of Polish and other Slavonic languages)
The proposed exploration deals with the praseological units, related to weaving. Semantic, linguistic and cultural analysis on the subject code and life-mode centrism reflection principle in imagery nominations of Polish...
Metapragmatic analysis of academic discourse
The article focuses on the study of the academic discourse notion and results of its metapragmatic analysis. Having singled out three stages of metapragmatic analysis of any discourse type, only two of them are discussed...