Superiority of Imam from the Viewpoint of Theological Denominations
Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2010, Vol 42, Issue 84
Abstract
One of the Imam's features, which has been controversial among the Muslim theologians is his superiority over other people of the community (umma). From their viewpoint, superiority is brought up in two aspects: first, superiority as surplus of nobility and reward with God; and the second, superiority in attributes, which is a condition for apparent Imamate. Imāmiyya theologians unanimously view the superiority in both aspects as among the prerequisites for Imamate. This issue was first set forth by the Shī‘as so as by relying on the superiority of their Imams they would prove the rightfulness of their Imamate. As for the people who were appointed as government officials, such as governors, military commanders, and judges, although superiority is not an absolute condition, they are to be superior over the subjects in what they are in charge of; and in no way the precedence of the inferior (mafḍūl) over the superior (fāḍil) is permissible. But, the Sunni theologians have had no unanimous and consistent viewpoint. Some have theoretically supported the necessity of a superior Imam and have regarded the order of the caliphs in its historical reality in the order of their superiority. However, most of the Mu’tazilites and Ash’arites have not necessarily deemed advisable the superior Imamate and have, under the pretext of protecting the umma’s interests, opined for the permissibility of inferior Imam despite the presence of the superior one. Each group has resorted to some evidence from the Book, Sunna, consensus (ijmā‘), and intellect to prove their own claim. Given that the acceptance of each one of these two bases would have a profound impact on outlining the politico-governmental structure of Islam, this article seeks to explain and critically review their viewpoints in this respect.
Authors and Affiliations
‘Alī Riḍā NajafzāDa
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP202547
- DOI 10.22067/philosophy.v42i1.11244
- Views 142
- Downloads 0
Levels of Knowledge from the Viewpoints of Mullā Ṣadrā and Spinoza
Levels of knowledge enjoy a significant status in the minds of the majority of western and eastern thinkers; and great thinkers have engaged in detailed discussions in this area. The present research has scrutinized this...
Developments in the ‘Rule of Grace’ concept and referent in Shi‘ite theology
Although the concept of the ‘Rule of Grace’ can be accurately deduced through some Qur’anic verses and traditions (Hadiths), the Mu‘tazilites among all theological denominations pioneered in its extraction, compilation a...
Reconstruction of the Epistemological Viewpoint of Mīrzā Mahdī Isfahānī (ra)
In this research, the viewpoint of Mīzā Mahdī Iṣfahānī, as the founder of Tafkīk School (Separatism), concerning the most important epistemological issues like the quiddity of cognition (or episteme), types of cognition,...
Types and Techniques of Education from the Viewpoint of Ṣadr al-Mut’allihīn
From the viewpoint of Ṣadr al-Mut’allihīn and under the influence of the principles of transcendental philosophy, the reality of education is to remove the obstacles from the way of Divine Emanation. With some methods, h...
Muṭahharī and the Neo-Religious Thinking
Neo-religious (Islamic) thinkers have frequently dealt with the issue of decline and revival of Islamic civilization and are thereby engaged in tradition and modernity. They have adopted two different approaches in confr...