THE LEGITIMACY OF LAW IN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES

Abstract

The legitimacy of the state power identifies an interactive relation of balance and cooperation between branches of power in the state, under the condition of a contemporary democratic political regime. The rule of law is based on the legitimacy of the Constitution itself and this quality preconditions can only be achieved by applying and respecting the principle of the legitimacy of state power and the ethical bodies directly involved in the complex process of establishing, mantaining and exercising state power. Legitimacy is the form of thinking and managing society within a predominant political order, around which a social consensus is built through different processes and at different times. In this paper we will try to produce an argument showing that the state has a legitimate authority and we need – as we can see – two aspects. On the one hand, the validity of the state’s claim to have authority (to order, to issue laws etc.) and on the other hand, the correlated obligation to obey. People are responsible for what they are doing. They are free to choose, to judge about the choices they are going to make, they take responsibility for their actions and their consequences. As philosopher I. Kant argued, the human person gives these moral norms to itself: to have personal autonomy means to obey the norms you give yourself. By definition, the idea of autonomy opposes the idea of obedience under the will of another. The person’s autonomy is incompatible with accepting to act according to the will of another. Sure, the autonomy does not mean that the person always refuses to take into account other people.

Authors and Affiliations

Oana Andra NIȚĂ

Keywords

Related Articles

DEFINING AGGRESSION IN THE LIGHT OF UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION

Historical background of the crime of aggresion, in the light of Nuremberg Principles of 1947 and UN General Asembly Resolution of 1974. The Rome Statute, which created an International Criminal Court, enlists the crime...

ANTITHETICAL PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL FORMALISM AND LEGAL REALISM

The necessity to outline a historical context is implicit in study of legal theories of formalism and realism. Understanding those notions presumes also understanding the social and polical context from the time of elabo...

THE AUTHOR(S) OF THE PHD THESIS AND HIS/THEIR MORAL RIGHTS. JOINT LIABILITY OF THE PHD CANDIDATE AND OF THE PHD SUPERVISOR FOR THE OBSERVANCE OF THE ETHICS AND DEONTOLOGY RULES

In the first part, this study proposes an analysis of the phrase “Author(s) of the PhD thesis” by reference to the principle The real author of the PhD thesis and the moral rights of the author of a scientific work provi...

THE INSTITUTION OF COMPLAINTS WITH AN ADMINISTRATIVE-JUDICIAL CHARACTER MADE BY THE PERSONS DEPRIVED OF THEIR LIBERTY TO PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS AND INTERESTS

This study is an analysis of how direct judicial control is exercised over the problems arising during the execution of sentences and custodial measures through a new institution, that of the the judge of surveillance...

HISTORICAL COST ACCOUNTING OR FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING FROM THE EARNINGS AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT PERSPECTIVE

This article studies the earnings and practice of depreciation of assets through the two accounting valuation systems: fair value accounting or historical cost accounting. It balances the methods used in each of the two...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP590484
  • DOI -
  • Views 138
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Oana Andra NIȚĂ (2019). THE LEGITIMACY OF LAW IN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 11(13), 631-636. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-590484