THE M. JOHNSON’S CRITICISM OF THE J. FODOR’S LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT HYPOTHESIS

Abstract

The study is to consider the Mark Johnson’s criticism of the Jerry Fodor’s Language of Thought hypothesis. Results. According to the J. Fodor’s hypothesis there is the language of thought also called “Mentalese” that is the meta-language in which mental representations of attitudes of organism to propositions expressed in object-language (for example: belief, hope, desire, statement) are formulated. These attitudes are called “propositional attitudes”. In the hypothesis propositional attitudes are thoughts and relations between organism and proposition. The language of thought is a formal language. The M. Johnson’s criticism of the language of thought hypothesis is based on the J. Fodor’s statement about the language of thought as a formal language. M. Johnson points out that “the language of thought” is a conceptual metaphor that is the result of other conceptual metaphor “the thought as language”. Metaphor “the language of thought” is declarative of the unreality of the language of thought as a language in contrast to the natural language. Originality. M. Johnson doesn’t take into consideration that “the formal language” is a conceptual metaphor: “the formal language” is the result of metaphorization of “the system of formal signs” on the analogy of the written language but not the natural language. To a certain extent any formal language is a written language. Thus, if J. Fodor says about the language of thought as the formal language then he should depicture the language of thought not as an acoustic sign system but as a visual sign system that represents something different, perhaps, different language. This is especially important when you understand that the J. Fodor’s language of thought has striking likeness with such formal language as epistemic logic.

Authors and Affiliations

Konstantin RAYHERT

Keywords

Related Articles

SOCIAL INSTITUTES AND ART

Introduction. Theoretical analysis of the artistic and historical process is an important problem for aesthetics. Cultural analysis makes it possible to see the dependence of artistic structures on the socio-economic con...

ETHICS OF INFORMATION BY LUCIANO FLORIDI – PROBLEM OF INFORMATIONAL PRIVACY AND MORALITY OF ARTIFICIAL AGENTS

Introduction. The article tackles the concept of IE (information ethics), the fundamental principles of IE and its place in the contemporary philosophical discourse by Luciano Floridi which are being represented in his p...

THE SYMBOLIC DIMENSION OF LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSNESS: REALITY, SECULARITY, IDENTITY

Introduction. The article is devoted to consideration of the symbolic nature of the linguistic dimension of human consciousness and interpretation within it the concepts of reality, identity and secularity. It is accente...

ICON AS ONE OF THE FACTORS FOR THE FORMATION OF UKRAINIAN ETHNIC IDENTITY

Introduction. In today's intellectual discourse, the problem of individual and collective identity has gained significant relevance in connection with the fact that the contemporary world blurs the outlines and boundarie...

DISCOURSE AS A SOCIO-CULTURAL PHENOMENON

Introduction. The article deals with the problem of discourse. The main trends of the doctrine of the discourse in historical perspective have been considered. It has been shown that the realities of modern life are the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP177535
  • DOI -
  • Views 135
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Konstantin RAYHERT (2016). THE M. JOHNSON’S CRITICISM OF THE J. FODOR’S LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT HYPOTHESIS. Вісник Черкаського університетету. Серія Філософія, 1(1), 67-77. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-177535