A shocking experiment: New evidence on probability weighting and common ratio violations

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 4

Abstract

We study whether probability weighting is observed when individuals are presented with a series of choices between lotteries consisting of real non-monetary adverse outcomes, electric shocks. Our estimation of the parameters of the probability weighting function proposed by Tversky and Kahneman (1992) are similar to those obtained in previous studies of lottery choice for negative monetary payoffs and negative hypothetical payoffs. In addition, common ratio violations in choice behavior are widespread. Our results provide evidence that probability weighting is a general phenomenon, independent of the source of disutility.

Authors and Affiliations

Gregory S. Berns, C. Monica Capra, Sara Moore and Charles Noussair

Keywords

Related Articles

Anonymity and incentives: An investigation of techniques to reduce socially desirable responding in the Trust Game

Economic games offer a convenient approach for the study of prosocial behavior. As an advantage, they allow for straightforward implementation of different techniques to reduce socially desirable responding. We investiga...

Prefer a cash slap in your face over credit for halva

We investigated how frequency and amount of punishment affect the decision making of Iranian subjects. In our first experiment, performing a computer-based Persian version of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), our subjects sc...

On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit

Although bullshit is common in everyday life and has attracted attention from philosophers, its reception (critical or ingenuous) has not, to our knowledge, been subject to empirical investigation. Here we focus on pseud...

Amos Tversky's contributions to legal scholarship: Remarks at the BDRM session in honor of Amos Tversky, June 16, 2006

Together with his long-time colleague Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, provided the intellectual infrastructure for contemporary behavioral law and economics. Prospect theory undermines the Coase Theorem, which is the bedr...

One-reason decision making in risky choice? A closer look at the priority heuristic

Although many models for risky choices between gambles assume that information is somehow integrated, the recently proposed priority heuristic (PH) claims that choices are based on one piece of information only. That is,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677582
  • DOI -
  • Views 201
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Gregory S. Berns, C. Monica Capra, Sara Moore and Charles Noussair (2007). A shocking experiment: New evidence on probability weighting and common ratio violations. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(4), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677582