Prefer a cash slap in your face over credit for halva

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 7

Abstract

We investigated how frequency and amount of punishment affect the decision making of Iranian subjects. In our first experiment, performing a computer-based Persian version of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), our subjects scored remarkably lower than their Western counterparts. Moreover, our subjects chose more frequently and more rapidly from decks that had less frequent but larger amounts of punishments in comparison to decks that had more frequent punishments with smaller amounts. In our second experiment, subjects did not differentiate between decks with the same frequency of punishment but with different punishment amounts. However, among decks with the same amount but different frequency of punishment, a significant preference was apparent towards decks with less frequency of punishment. Our results differ from previous studies, indicating a different strategy in risky decision making among healthy adult Iranian subjects, as they show low attention to the amount of punishment and are more concerned with the frequency of punishment.

Authors and Affiliations

Hamed Ekhtiari, Ali Jannati, Morteza Dehghani and Azarakhsh Mokri

Keywords

Related Articles

Psychophysics and the judgment of price: Judging complex objects on a non-physical dimension elicits sequential effects like those in perceptual tasks

When participants in psychophysical experiments are asked to estimate or identify stimuli which differ on a single physical dimension, their judgments are influenced by the local experimental context — the item presented...

Do Europeans like nudges?

In recent years, many governments have shown a keen interest in “nudges” — approaches to law and policy that maintain freedom of choice, but that steer people in certain directions. Yet to date, there has been little evi...

The boundary effect: Perceived post hoc accuracy of prediction intervals

Predictions of magnitudes (costs, durations, environmental events) are often given as uncertainty intervals (ranges). When are such forecasts judged to be correct? We report results of four experiments showing that forec...

Dual processes and moral conflict: Evidence for deontological reasoners’ intuitive utilitarian sensitivity

The prominent dual process model of moral cognition suggests that reasoners intuitively detect that harming others is wrong (deontological System-1 morality) but have to engage in demanding deliberation to realize that h...

How bookies make your money

UK bookies (bookmakers) herd geographically in less-affluent areas. The present work shows that UK bookies also herd with the special bets that they advertise to consumers, both in their shop window advertising and on TV...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677710
  • DOI -
  • Views 148
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hamed Ekhtiari, Ali Jannati, Morteza Dehghani and Azarakhsh Mokri (2009). Prefer a cash slap in your face over credit for halva. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(7), -. https://www.europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677710